Karnataka HC dismisses
assessee’s (a Trust running 13 Educational Institutions) writ, upholds
withdrawal of Sec. 10(23C) exemption with retrospective effect from April 1,
2009 (i.e. the date on which approval was granted) onwards; Revenue had
withdrawn exemption based on a search and seizure operation conducted in
December, 2015 on assessee’s various premises which revealed cash donations
(capitation fees) collected from students for admission to medical courses and
utilized for personal gains of trustees; Observes that approval u/s. 10(23C)
was thoroughly misused by the trustees, notes that a staggering sum of Rs. 52
cr. of capitation fees was booked under the innocuous name of ‘Anonymous
Donations’ which was clearly against public policy and specifically prohibited
by SC in various cases; Holds that “Trust had indulged in illegal activities …
and rather various other business activities of the family of Trustees and
their money was passing through the cover and shields of the Books of Accounts
of the petitioner - Trust rendering it as merely a skeleton for the purpose of
exemption..”, remarks that “the petitioner - Trust cannot be allowed to cry wolf
on the anvil of breach of principles of natural justice.”; Upholding exemption
withdrawal from April 2009 onwards, HC states that “illegalities and
transactions offending the said provisions cannot be split or bifurcated for
the period in question only after the search and seizure operations were
carried out on 16/12/2015 and the illegality cannot be allowed to be
perpetuated for the preceding periods for which such evidence pointing out the
illegalities exist on record.”, distinguishes assessee’s reliance on SC rulings
in Queen’s Educational Society and American Hotel and Lodging Association
Educational Institute, Rajasthan HC ruling in Geetanjali University Trust:HC
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Delhi HC holds 10% pre-deposit requirement for penalty-only appeals inapplicable where SCN was issued before amendment
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Delhi High Court (HC) [1] on whether the newly introduced pre-deposit requirement for fi...
-
ITC is blocked on motor vehicles having seating capacity ≤ 13 persons (including the driver) used for the transportation of persons. Furth...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent judgement of the Delhi High Court (HC)on imposition of penalty on directors of a company under the Ce...
-
Recently, in a significant taxpayer-friendly ruling, the Hon’ble Mumbai ITAT, in the case of Nikesh Bhagwandas Mehta vs. ITO , has clarifi...
-
Section 68 -Cash credits Section 69 -Unexplained investments Section 69A - Unexplained money, etc Section 69B -Amount of investme...
-
THE issues before the Bench are - Whether when an expenditure is claimed to have been incurred by an assessee for promotion of his busine...
-
Income Tax Department had clarify that the renting of mobile tower would attract lower TDS Deductions u/s. 194-I and not u/s...
-
LEASE-DEED (A brief Introduction) Lease defined. A lease of immovable property is a transfer of a right to enjoy such property, mad...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent Circular issued by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) clarifying the manner of gra...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent judgement of the Kerala High Court (HC) 1 upholding the validity of GST notifications 2 extending the t...
No comments:
Post a Comment