Karnataka HC dismisses
assessee’s (a Trust running 13 Educational Institutions) writ, upholds
withdrawal of Sec. 10(23C) exemption with retrospective effect from April 1,
2009 (i.e. the date on which approval was granted) onwards; Revenue had
withdrawn exemption based on a search and seizure operation conducted in
December, 2015 on assessee’s various premises which revealed cash donations
(capitation fees) collected from students for admission to medical courses and
utilized for personal gains of trustees; Observes that approval u/s. 10(23C)
was thoroughly misused by the trustees, notes that a staggering sum of Rs. 52
cr. of capitation fees was booked under the innocuous name of ‘Anonymous
Donations’ which was clearly against public policy and specifically prohibited
by SC in various cases; Holds that “Trust had indulged in illegal activities …
and rather various other business activities of the family of Trustees and
their money was passing through the cover and shields of the Books of Accounts
of the petitioner - Trust rendering it as merely a skeleton for the purpose of
exemption..”, remarks that “the petitioner - Trust cannot be allowed to cry wolf
on the anvil of breach of principles of natural justice.”; Upholding exemption
withdrawal from April 2009 onwards, HC states that “illegalities and
transactions offending the said provisions cannot be split or bifurcated for
the period in question only after the search and seizure operations were
carried out on 16/12/2015 and the illegality cannot be allowed to be
perpetuated for the preceding periods for which such evidence pointing out the
illegalities exist on record.”, distinguishes assessee’s reliance on SC rulings
in Queen’s Educational Society and American Hotel and Lodging Association
Educational Institute, Rajasthan HC ruling in Geetanjali University Trust:HC
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
CBDT issues second round of frequently asked questions in relation to Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024
This Tax Alert summarizes Circular No. 19/2024 dated 16 December 2024 (VSV 2- December Circular) issued by the Central Board of Direct Tax...
-
PCIT vs. The Executor of Estate of Late Smt. Manjula A. Shah (Bombay High Court) S. 50C Capital Gains: The valuation of the stamp autho...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Supreme Court (SC) [1] on availability of CENVAT Credit on mobile towers and pre-fabrica...
-
IFRS and US GAAP - Similarities and Differences What is IFRS? And what is GAAP? The main difference between IFRS and US GAAP is that G...
-
Madras HC reverses ITAT's order, grants deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) to assessee (a society engaged in the business of banking and provi...
-
SC dismisses assessee-company’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order upholding re-assessment initiation (beyond 4 yrs period) based on a special...
-
SC dismisses Revenue’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order in case of assessee (belonging to Lodha group of companies engaged in real estate bu...
-
Claiming a foreign tax credit (FTC) in Australia allows companies to offset foreign taxes paid on income earned overseas against their Aust...
-
HC allows HDFC Bank’s writ petition, quashes AO’s order and subsequent reference to TPO alleging that certain related party transactions [p...
-
Delhi ITAT deletes Rs. 1558.57 cr. capital gains addition on Telenor India for AY 2014-15, holds that set off of non-refundable entry fee p...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Bombay High Court (HC)1 on admissibility of input tax credit (ITC) w.r.t GST on advance p...
No comments:
Post a Comment