Monday, 27 October 2014

AMD Research & Development Center vs. DCIT (ITAT Hyderabad)


In view of the finding of the service-tax authorities that services were rendered, argument that amount paid is a reimbursement of actual cost without profit element is not acceptable and it is chargeable as “fee for included services”
Having held that the amount in question was remitted by the assessee company to ATI Technologies, Canada for certain benefits received by it in the form of services procured by ATI Technologies, Canada from Soctronics India Private Limited and provided to the assessee company, and it was not a case of either gratuitous payment made […]

No comments:

Mumbai ITAT clarifies: Capital gains exemption under Section 54F cannot be restricted by intra-head capital loss adjustment

  Recently, in a significant taxpayer-friendly ruling, the Hon’ble Mumbai ITAT, in the case of Nikesh Bhagwandas Mehta vs. ITO , has clarifi...