Friday, 24 October 2014

No S. 14A/ Rule 8D Disallowance if accounts not examined. Consent fee paid to SEBI is not penalty for infraction of law

ITO vs. Reliance Share and Stock Brokers (P) Ltd (ITAT Mumbai)



Re Disallowance made u/s 14A r.w. rule 8D (i) It is now settled principle that the assessing officer has to examine the disallowance made by the assessee by having regard to the accounts of the assessee and only thereafter the AO, if he is not satisfied with the correctness of the claim, shall determine the […]

No comments:

Mumbai ITAT clarifies: Capital gains exemption under Section 54F cannot be restricted by intra-head capital loss adjustment

  Recently, in a significant taxpayer-friendly ruling, the Hon’ble Mumbai ITAT, in the case of Nikesh Bhagwandas Mehta vs. ITO , has clarifi...