Mumbai ITAT rules that
consideration received by assessee-company (engaged in research development,
manufacturing, licensing of bio-pharmaceuticals products) on assignment
of indigenously developed patent of a medicine shall be taxable
as ‘capital gains’ and shall be subject to applicability of Sec. 55(2)
(which states that cost of acquisition for self-generated goodwill, right to
manufacture etc. shall be taken at ‘nil’) for AY 2008-09; Assessee had argued
that the amount was a non-taxable capital receipt, as no cost was incurred for
developing the patent and further even if cost was incurred, it was not
ascertainable, moreover transfer of know–how/patent was not covered by Sec.
55(2); ITAT notes that for developing a patent of medicine, assessee has
to carry out research analysis and experimentation, further notes that medical
patents require clinical tests and administering drugs to the patients, hence
the claim that no cost was incurred is not acceptable; ITAT holds that
assessee’s case falls under the ambit of ‘right to manufacture/produce/process
any article or thing’ as envisaged u/s 55(2)(a), distinguishes assessee’s
reliance on ITAT ruling in Kwality Biscuit (P.) Ltd. as it dealt with
trade-mark and brand name, similarly distinguishes assessee’s reliance on
Bombay HC ruling in Fernhill Laboratories and Industrial Establishment on
facts:ITAT
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Karnataka HC holds HSNS Cess framework unconstitutional due to manner of Cess calculation
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Karnataka High Court (HC) [1] on the constitutional validity of Health Security se Natio...
-
ITC is blocked on motor vehicles having seating capacity ≤ 13 persons (including the driver) used for the transportation of persons. Furth...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent judgement of the Delhi High Court (HC)on imposition of penalty on directors of a company under the Ce...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
Clarifications from the GST Council The GST Council has recommended the following clarifications on ISD and cross charge:
-
Recently, in a significant taxpayer-friendly ruling, the Hon’ble Mumbai ITAT, in the case of Nikesh Bhagwandas Mehta vs. ITO , has clarifi...
-
Section 68 -Cash credits Section 69 -Unexplained investments Section 69A - Unexplained money, etc Section 69B -Amount of investme...
-
LEASE-DEED (A brief Introduction) Lease defined. A lease of immovable property is a transfer of a right to enjoy such property, mad...
-
THE issues before the Bench are - Whether when an expenditure is claimed to have been incurred by an assessee for promotion of his busine...
-
Income Tax Department had clarify that the renting of mobile tower would attract lower TDS Deductions u/s. 194-I and not u/s...
-
Sr No Due Date Related to Compliance to be made 1 11.07.2026 GST ...
No comments:
Post a Comment