Mumbai ITAT allows
deduction u/s. 37 to Zee Entertainment (‘assessee’) with respect
to write off of advance given to BCCI, rejects Revenue's stand that it
represents a capital loss as it is in relation to acquisition of media
rights (which is a capital asset); Assessee acquired media rights from
BCCI on payment of US $ 17.5 million, out of which US$ 10 million was adjusted
against two matches played and the balance was kept as deposit (to be adjusted
against last series), however, owing to dispute, the contract was terminated
and the deposit was forfeited by BCCI during relevant AY 2008-09; ITAT holds
that the agreement with BCCI for acquiring the media rights was pursuant to
assessee’s normal business activity (of broadcasting and distribution of
TV programmes) and US$ 10 million which was adjusted in earlier year was
offered to tax by assessee; Further rejects Revenue’s stand that since the
assessee filed a legal case for recovery and also initiated arbitration
proceedings, it could not be said that the loss had actually crystallized
during relevant AY, similarly, rejects Revenue’s submission that write-off was
premature as assessee did not fully explore the possibility of its recovery;
ITAT remarks that “it is the judgement of the assessee as a businessman.”,
notes that despite arbitration proceedings, as assessee did not visualize any
sign of recovery, it wrote-off the forfeited amount and claimed deduction:ITAT
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
CBDT issues second round of frequently asked questions in relation to Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024
This Tax Alert summarizes Circular No. 19/2024 dated 16 December 2024 (VSV 2- December Circular) issued by the Central Board of Direct Tax...
-
PCIT vs. The Executor of Estate of Late Smt. Manjula A. Shah (Bombay High Court) S. 50C Capital Gains: The valuation of the stamp autho...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Supreme Court (SC) [1] on availability of CENVAT Credit on mobile towers and pre-fabrica...
-
IFRS and US GAAP - Similarities and Differences What is IFRS? And what is GAAP? The main difference between IFRS and US GAAP is that G...
-
Madras HC reverses ITAT's order, grants deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) to assessee (a society engaged in the business of banking and provi...
-
SC dismisses assessee-company’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order upholding re-assessment initiation (beyond 4 yrs period) based on a special...
-
SC dismisses Revenue’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order in case of assessee (belonging to Lodha group of companies engaged in real estate bu...
-
Claiming a foreign tax credit (FTC) in Australia allows companies to offset foreign taxes paid on income earned overseas against their Aust...
-
HC allows HDFC Bank’s writ petition, quashes AO’s order and subsequent reference to TPO alleging that certain related party transactions [p...
-
Delhi ITAT deletes Rs. 1558.57 cr. capital gains addition on Telenor India for AY 2014-15, holds that set off of non-refundable entry fee p...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Bombay High Court (HC)1 on admissibility of input tax credit (ITC) w.r.t GST on advance p...
No comments:
Post a Comment