Mumbai ITAT allows
deduction u/s. 37 to Zee Entertainment (‘assessee’) with respect
to write off of advance given to BCCI, rejects Revenue's stand that it
represents a capital loss as it is in relation to acquisition of media
rights (which is a capital asset); Assessee acquired media rights from
BCCI on payment of US $ 17.5 million, out of which US$ 10 million was adjusted
against two matches played and the balance was kept as deposit (to be adjusted
against last series), however, owing to dispute, the contract was terminated
and the deposit was forfeited by BCCI during relevant AY 2008-09; ITAT holds
that the agreement with BCCI for acquiring the media rights was pursuant to
assessee’s normal business activity (of broadcasting and distribution of
TV programmes) and US$ 10 million which was adjusted in earlier year was
offered to tax by assessee; Further rejects Revenue’s stand that since the
assessee filed a legal case for recovery and also initiated arbitration
proceedings, it could not be said that the loss had actually crystallized
during relevant AY, similarly, rejects Revenue’s submission that write-off was
premature as assessee did not fully explore the possibility of its recovery;
ITAT remarks that “it is the judgement of the assessee as a businessman.”,
notes that despite arbitration proceedings, as assessee did not visualize any
sign of recovery, it wrote-off the forfeited amount and claimed deduction:ITAT
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Gujarat High Court reaffirms mandatory right to personal hearing in Faceless Assessments
Recently, the Hon’ble Gujarat High Court in B.M. Developers v. Assessment Unit of Income-tax Department ruled in favor of the taxpayer and...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
Selling a property can trigger a significant tax liability in the form of capital gains tax. However, the Income-tax Act, 1961, allows you...
-
Clarifications from the GST Council The GST Council has recommended the following clarifications on ISD and cross charge:
-
The Indian tax landscape has witnessed several significant judicial pronouncements in recent months. From the Supreme Court to various Hig...
-
The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal has recently notified the Income-tax (Appellate Tribunal) Amendment Rules, 2025, introducing important p...
-
The Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime continues to evolve through judicial interpretations. From the Supreme Court to various High Court...
-
Sr No Due Date Related to Compliance to be made 1 11.07.2026 GST ...
-
In the case of "Maya Gopinathan vs Anoop SB 2024 INSC 334," the Hon'ble Supreme Court provided insightful guidance on the de...
-
In a significant development, the Supreme Court has dismissed the Revenue’s Special Leave Petition (SLP) challenging a Bombay High Court (...
-
For Non-Resident Indians (NRIs) planning to move back home, the relocation is only half the journey. The other half is understanding how t...
No comments:
Post a Comment