Mumbai ITAT rules that
amount received by assessee ( a US company engaged in grading and
certification of diamonds) on account of reimbursement of travel expenses,
group health insurance and other incidental expenses in connection with the
assignment under training and technical service Agreement (‘TTA’), not FTS
for AYs 2009-10 and 2011-12; Assessee had entered into TTA for training the
employees of the Indian group company and providing technical services for the
implementation of grading policies, procedures and processes, further separate
debit notes were raised for training & technical services and
reimbursement; Rejects Revenue’s stand that the total amount received by
assessee including reimbursement would constitute FTS; Referring to
the TTA, ITAT notes that assessee was entitled to receive by way of fee only
the amount incurred by towards cost to ‘employ’ individuals plus mark-up of
6.5%, remarks that “the expression cost to ‘employ’ individuals is different
from the expression cost incurred to ‘depute’ a person”; Rules that the cost of
employment would include only internal costs incurred by organisation to employ
individual, whereas any cost incurred over and above that to depute the
individual for a particular assignment (i.e. travel, insurance etc.), would be
external cost, not includible as FTS, relies on SC ruling in A.P. Moller Maersk
A/S:ITAT
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
CBDT issues second round of frequently asked questions in relation to Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024
This Tax Alert summarizes Circular No. 19/2024 dated 16 December 2024 (VSV 2- December Circular) issued by the Central Board of Direct Tax...
-
PCIT vs. The Executor of Estate of Late Smt. Manjula A. Shah (Bombay High Court) S. 50C Capital Gains: The valuation of the stamp autho...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Supreme Court (SC) [1] on availability of CENVAT Credit on mobile towers and pre-fabrica...
-
IFRS and US GAAP - Similarities and Differences What is IFRS? And what is GAAP? The main difference between IFRS and US GAAP is that G...
-
Madras HC reverses ITAT's order, grants deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) to assessee (a society engaged in the business of banking and provi...
-
SC dismisses assessee-company’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order upholding re-assessment initiation (beyond 4 yrs period) based on a special...
-
SC dismisses Revenue’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order in case of assessee (belonging to Lodha group of companies engaged in real estate bu...
-
Claiming a foreign tax credit (FTC) in Australia allows companies to offset foreign taxes paid on income earned overseas against their Aust...
-
HC allows HDFC Bank’s writ petition, quashes AO’s order and subsequent reference to TPO alleging that certain related party transactions [p...
-
Delhi ITAT deletes Rs. 1558.57 cr. capital gains addition on Telenor India for AY 2014-15, holds that set off of non-refundable entry fee p...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Bombay High Court (HC)1 on admissibility of input tax credit (ITC) w.r.t GST on advance p...
No comments:
Post a Comment