Mumbai ITAT allows
deduction u/s. 37 to Zee Entertainment (‘assessee’) with respect
to write off of advance given to BCCI, rejects Revenue's stand that it
represents a capital loss as it is in relation to acquisition of media
rights (which is a capital asset); Assessee acquired media rights from
BCCI on payment of US $ 17.5 million, out of which US$ 10 million was adjusted
against two matches played and the balance was kept as deposit (to be adjusted
against last series), however, owing to dispute, the contract was terminated
and the deposit was forfeited by BCCI during relevant AY 2008-09; ITAT holds
that the agreement with BCCI for acquiring the media rights was pursuant to
assessee’s normal business activity (of broadcasting and distribution of
TV programmes) and US$ 10 million which was adjusted in earlier year was
offered to tax by assessee; Further rejects Revenue’s stand that since the
assessee filed a legal case for recovery and also initiated arbitration
proceedings, it could not be said that the loss had actually crystallized
during relevant AY, similarly, rejects Revenue’s submission that write-off was
premature as assessee did not fully explore the possibility of its recovery;
ITAT remarks that “it is the judgement of the assessee as a businessman.”,
notes that despite arbitration proceedings, as assessee did not visualize any
sign of recovery, it wrote-off the forfeited amount and claimed deduction:ITAT
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Bombay High Court Clarifies Tax Exemption Eligibility for Venture Capital Funds
In a significant ruling, the Bombay High Court has reaffirmed that a Venture Capital Fund (VCF) registered with SEBI is entitled to claim ...
-
Slump sale is transfer of one or more business undertakings for a lump sum consideration, without assigning individual values to the each...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
Facts Centrica India Offshore Private Limited (CIO), an Indian Company, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Centrica Plc, UK Centrica Plc a...
-
The Tax Audit season has started and it’s the time when the Assessees rush to their Chartered Accountants (CA) to get their Tax Audit d...
-
SREI Infrastructure Finance Ltd vs. ITSC (Delhi High Court) The assessee entered into a scheme of arrangement u/s 391-394 of the Compani...
-
Facts The taxpayer, a partnership firm, derived income from the business of handling and transport of ship containers, customs clearing a...
-
M/s. Alpha Projects Society P. Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) In AY 2005-06, the assessee made payments to contractors & for professi...
-
01. TDS u/s 194J is required to be done for Royalty also w.e.f 13-7-2006. 02. Royalty had been defined under explanation 2 of se...
-
F.No.354/66/2011-TRU Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Central Board of Excise & Customs...
-
M/s. Merilyn Shipping & Transports vs. ACIT (ITAT Visakhapatnam Special Bench) The assessee incurred brokerage expenses of Rs.38....
No comments:
Post a Comment