HC
exercises writ jurisdiction to set aside adjudication order confirming excise
duty liability on activity of supply of IT products purchased from vendors and
installation at customers’ premises after customization as per their needs;
Notes assessee’s claim that integrating multiple products sourced from
different vendors only involved a skill of service and nothing else,
accordingly it had paid service tax thereon; Seeking to set right the
jurisdictional error committed in decision making process, HC observes that
each of assessee’s activities would require to be examined on focal point
whether they would fall within the meaning of manufacture of goods or not;
There cannot be generalization of assessee’s activities, states HC while
observing, “No doubt, the law discussed by the Commissioner is the correct
principles revolving around the issue. But, the point is whether each of the
activities of the petitioner would fall for consideration as a 'manufacturer of
goods' or not.” ; Accordingly, remands the matter for fresh consideration,
without expressing any view on merits : Kerala HC
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
India-Mauritius DTAA Protocol Notified: Key Tax Implications
The Government of India has notified the amendment to the Protocol of the India-Mauritius Double Tax Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) on 13 Oct...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
In a recent informal guidance letter, SEBI clarified whether a cousin of a Promoter Group member qualifies as a person ‘related to promote...
-
Slump sale is transfer of one or more business undertakings for a lump sum consideration, without assigning individual values to the each...
-
Key features of File Validation Utility (FVU) version 3.3 FVU 3.3 will be applicable for quarterly TDS/ TCS statements pertaining to...
-
CIT vs. The Instalment Supply Ltd (Delhi High Court) The assessee bought 1614 items of computer systems for Rs.40 lacs from HCL Hewlett ...
-
Facts The applicant („A‟) is a closely held Public Limited company incorporated in India in the year 1953. A‟s shareholder included A (...
-
01. TDS u/s 194J is required to be done for Royalty also w.e.f 13-7-2006. 02. Royalty had been defined under explanation 2 of se...
-
Until now, 'Samaritans' is not how the Independent Directors are purported by Clause 49 in the Listing agreement. An Independ...
-
1. Concept of “limited liability partnership” LLP is an alternative corporate business form that gives the benefits of limited liability ...
-
SREI Infrastructure Finance Ltd vs. ITSC (Delhi High Court) The assessee entered into a scheme of arrangement u/s 391-394 of the Compani...
No comments:
Post a Comment