ITAT upholds Revenue's plea
that assessee (a private limited company & engaged in real estate
business) received high share premium as a conduit to route the funds
involved as a 'layering' process, holds that share-premium of Rs.49.5cr is
taxable u/s 68 as unexplained cash credit for AY 2008-09; ITAT considers facts
such as absence of proper valuation report to justify high premium,
relatively weak financials compared to high valuation, issue of shares to
directors at par, discrepancies / abnormal features which indicate that share
issue was “made up” to camouflage the real purpose/intention of routing
money; Relying on Calcutta High Court ruling in Pragati Financial
Management Pvt. Ltd. Vs. CIT, ITAT holds that share capital addition can be
made u/s 68 since the initial onus was not discharged by the assessee;
Also, rejects assessee's reliance on Delhi ITAT ruling in ACIT Vs. NRA Iron
& Steel Pvt. Ltd., wherein funding was raised from multiple investors as against
assessee's facts where a single investor was present; On the issue of
jurisdiction, ITAT upholds validity of second re-assessment notice
(issued within 6 days after the first reassessment was dropped) which
resulted in share premium addition, ITAT holds that "since
substantive issue in question was never examined under the proceedings in
the first notice issued on 18.4.2012, the question of change of opinion
does not arise" :ITAT
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
India-Mauritius DTAA Protocol Notified: Key Tax Implications
The Government of India has notified the amendment to the Protocol of the India-Mauritius Double Tax Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) on 13 Oct...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
In a recent informal guidance letter, SEBI clarified whether a cousin of a Promoter Group member qualifies as a person ‘related to promote...
-
Slump sale is transfer of one or more business undertakings for a lump sum consideration, without assigning individual values to the each...
-
Key features of File Validation Utility (FVU) version 3.3 FVU 3.3 will be applicable for quarterly TDS/ TCS statements pertaining to...
-
CIT vs. The Instalment Supply Ltd (Delhi High Court) The assessee bought 1614 items of computer systems for Rs.40 lacs from HCL Hewlett ...
-
Facts The applicant („A‟) is a closely held Public Limited company incorporated in India in the year 1953. A‟s shareholder included A (...
-
01. TDS u/s 194J is required to be done for Royalty also w.e.f 13-7-2006. 02. Royalty had been defined under explanation 2 of se...
-
Until now, 'Samaritans' is not how the Independent Directors are purported by Clause 49 in the Listing agreement. An Independ...
-
1. Concept of “limited liability partnership” LLP is an alternative corporate business form that gives the benefits of limited liability ...
-
SREI Infrastructure Finance Ltd vs. ITSC (Delhi High Court) The assessee entered into a scheme of arrangement u/s 391-394 of the Compani...
No comments:
Post a Comment