OECD's Tax Challenges
Arising from Digitalisation – Interim Report 2018 (the Interim
Report) released a few minutes ago acknowledges 'divergent views' on
taxation approach and highlights that countries will work towards a
consensus-based solution; The Interim Report notes that there is no consensus
on the merits of, or need for, interim measures, and does not make a
recommendation for their introduction; The Interim Report agreed by the
more than 110 members of the Inclusive Framework outlines a number of
areas where there are clear differences of view among the countries, including
over the need for future reform of the international tax system; The
Interim Report provides a sense of direction that reflects the commitment
of the Inclusive Framework members to work towards a consensus-based, global
solution on these matters; The Interim report sets the goal of
producing a final report in 2020, with an update to the G20 in 2019; The
Interim Report notes that the "members agreed to undertake a coherent and
concurrent review of the “nexus” and “profit allocation” rules - fundamental
concepts relating to the allocation of taxing rights between jurisdictions and
the determination of the relevant share of the multinational enterprise’s
profits that will be subject to taxation in a given jurisdiction";
The Interim Report discusses interim measures that some countries have
indicated they would implement, believing that there is a strong imperative to
act quickly; The Interim Report specifically considers an interim measure in
the form of an 'excise tax' on the supply of certain e-services within their
jurisdiction that would apply to the gross consideration paid for the supply of
such e-services; The Inclusive Framework’s Task Force on the Digital Economy
will meet next in July 2018; The report cites India has adopted rules for
the VAT treatment of B2C supplies of services and intangibles by foreign
suppliers in accordance with the OECD International VAT/GST Guidelines; The
Interim report also describes in details India's Significant Economic
Presence based taxation, Equalisation levy & cites Bangalore ITAT ruling
on “virtual service PE”
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Section 56(2)(ix): Forfeiture of Advance Money Received – A Critical Analysis
The Dual Conditions for Taxability Section 56(2)(ix) of the Income Tax Act imposes tax liability on sums received as advance or otherwise du...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
Selling a property can trigger a significant tax liability in the form of capital gains tax. However, the Income-tax Act, 1961, allows you...
-
Clarifications from the GST Council The GST Council has recommended the following clarifications on ISD and cross charge:
-
The Indian tax landscape has witnessed several significant judicial pronouncements in recent months. From the Supreme Court to various Hig...
-
The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal has recently notified the Income-tax (Appellate Tribunal) Amendment Rules, 2025, introducing important p...
-
The Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime continues to evolve through judicial interpretations. From the Supreme Court to various High Court...
-
Sr No Due Date Related to Compliance to be made 1 11.07.2026 GST ...
-
In the case of "Maya Gopinathan vs Anoop SB 2024 INSC 334," the Hon'ble Supreme Court provided insightful guidance on the de...
-
LEASE-DEED (A brief Introduction) Lease defined. A lease of immovable property is a transfer of a right to enjoy such property, mad...
-
In a significant development, the Supreme Court has dismissed the Revenue’s Special Leave Petition (SLP) challenging a Bombay High Court (...
No comments:
Post a Comment