ITAT upholds Revenue's plea
that assessee (a private limited company & engaged in real estate
business) received high share premium as a conduit to route the funds
involved as a 'layering' process, holds that share-premium of Rs.49.5cr is
taxable u/s 68 as unexplained cash credit for AY 2008-09; ITAT considers facts
such as absence of proper valuation report to justify high premium,
relatively weak financials compared to high valuation, issue of shares to
directors at par, discrepancies / abnormal features which indicate that share
issue was “made up” to camouflage the real purpose/intention of routing
money; Relying on Calcutta High Court ruling in Pragati Financial
Management Pvt. Ltd. Vs. CIT, ITAT holds that share capital addition can be
made u/s 68 since the initial onus was not discharged by the assessee;
Also, rejects assessee's reliance on Delhi ITAT ruling in ACIT Vs. NRA Iron
& Steel Pvt. Ltd., wherein funding was raised from multiple investors as against
assessee's facts where a single investor was present; On the issue of
jurisdiction, ITAT upholds validity of second re-assessment notice
(issued within 6 days after the first reassessment was dropped) which
resulted in share premium addition, ITAT holds that "since
substantive issue in question was never examined under the proceedings in
the first notice issued on 18.4.2012, the question of change of opinion
does not arise" :ITAT
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Bombay High Court Clarifies Tax Exemption Eligibility for Venture Capital Funds
In a significant ruling, the Bombay High Court has reaffirmed that a Venture Capital Fund (VCF) registered with SEBI is entitled to claim ...
-
Slump sale is transfer of one or more business undertakings for a lump sum consideration, without assigning individual values to the each...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
Facts Centrica India Offshore Private Limited (CIO), an Indian Company, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Centrica Plc, UK Centrica Plc a...
-
The Tax Audit season has started and it’s the time when the Assessees rush to their Chartered Accountants (CA) to get their Tax Audit d...
-
SREI Infrastructure Finance Ltd vs. ITSC (Delhi High Court) The assessee entered into a scheme of arrangement u/s 391-394 of the Compani...
-
Facts The taxpayer, a partnership firm, derived income from the business of handling and transport of ship containers, customs clearing a...
-
M/s. Alpha Projects Society P. Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) In AY 2005-06, the assessee made payments to contractors & for professi...
-
01. TDS u/s 194J is required to be done for Royalty also w.e.f 13-7-2006. 02. Royalty had been defined under explanation 2 of se...
-
F.No.354/66/2011-TRU Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Central Board of Excise & Customs...
-
M/s. Merilyn Shipping & Transports vs. ACIT (ITAT Visakhapatnam Special Bench) The assessee incurred brokerage expenses of Rs.38....
No comments:
Post a Comment