Delhi ITAT upholds
taxation of consideration for providing SAP/CAD software related support
as FTS under Article 13(4)(a), being ancillary and subsidiary to the enjoyment
of the right / property for which royalty was received by assessee (a UK
co., JCBE), clarifies that ‘make available’ clause under Article 13(4)(c) is
not applicable; ITAT notes that in earlier years, assessee had entered into
bilateral agreement under which it used to receive royalty from JCB India
(Indian subsidiary) for licensing the technology with an exclusive right to
manufacture and market, however, during relevant AY, assessee entered into a
Tripartite Agreement whereby the technology was sub-licensed by assessee to JCB
investments, and the royalty paid by JCB India was routed through JCB
Investments; Thus noting that entire royalty amount was passed on to assessee
through JCB Investments less 0.5%, ITAT holds JCB Investments as a pass through
entity, remarks that "Substance will rule over
form", observes that except for this routing of royalty through JCB
Investments, all the terms and conditions of the agreement between the assessee
and JCB India including secondment of assessee's employee to JCB India for
rendering of services; Rejects assessee’s stand that co-ordinate bench ruling
holding JCB India a Service PE of assessee cannot be applied in present facts,
observes that there is no difference in the facts and circumstances except for
the tripartite vs. bilateral arrangement; Further follows co-ordinate bench
ruling to hold that royalty was not effectively connected to PE in India,
therefore, cannot be considered under Article 13(6), but should be taxed as
royalty / FTS under Article 13 itself:ITAT
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Bombay High Court Clarifies Tax Exemption Eligibility for Venture Capital Funds
In a significant ruling, the Bombay High Court has reaffirmed that a Venture Capital Fund (VCF) registered with SEBI is entitled to claim ...
-
Slump sale is transfer of one or more business undertakings for a lump sum consideration, without assigning individual values to the each...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
Facts Centrica India Offshore Private Limited (CIO), an Indian Company, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Centrica Plc, UK Centrica Plc a...
-
The Tax Audit season has started and it’s the time when the Assessees rush to their Chartered Accountants (CA) to get their Tax Audit d...
-
SREI Infrastructure Finance Ltd vs. ITSC (Delhi High Court) The assessee entered into a scheme of arrangement u/s 391-394 of the Compani...
-
Facts The taxpayer, a partnership firm, derived income from the business of handling and transport of ship containers, customs clearing a...
-
M/s. Alpha Projects Society P. Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) In AY 2005-06, the assessee made payments to contractors & for professi...
-
01. TDS u/s 194J is required to be done for Royalty also w.e.f 13-7-2006. 02. Royalty had been defined under explanation 2 of se...
-
F.No.354/66/2011-TRU Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Central Board of Excise & Customs...
-
M/s. Merilyn Shipping & Transports vs. ACIT (ITAT Visakhapatnam Special Bench) The assessee incurred brokerage expenses of Rs.38....
No comments:
Post a Comment