SAT disposes of appeal
challenging Circular issued by the National Stock Exchange of India Limited
(‘NSE’), dated July 17, 2018, which inter alia prescribes collection of
Securities Transaction Tax (‘STT’) on physical settlement of stock derivatives;
Notes that (i) NSE had issued the circular, pursuant to SEBI’s circular on
“Review of framework for stocks in Derivatives segment” and (ii) accordingly,
46 scrips were identified for compulsory physical settlement, after the expiry
of the ongoing cycle of derivatives contracts; Accepts Appellant’s submission
that NSE’s caveat about waiting for clarification from the Central Board of
Direct Taxes (‘CBDT’) over ambiguity w.r.t. STT rate to be levied, is
impractical, as clients require clarity on the STT to be paid, and that given
the uncertainty, there could be severe repercussions on the securities market
(particularly in the derivatives segment); Rejects NSE’s contentions regarding
specification of the STT rate in Finance Act and its substantiation on the
caveat; Opines that “the circular does generate considerable
ambiguity… given the ambiguity the circular has generated and the
potential adverse effect it would have on the securities market it is in the
interest of justice for CBDT to consider the matter on top priority..”:SAT
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
CBDT issues second round of frequently asked questions in relation to Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024
This Tax Alert summarizes Circular No. 19/2024 dated 16 December 2024 (VSV 2- December Circular) issued by the Central Board of Direct Tax...
-
PCIT vs. The Executor of Estate of Late Smt. Manjula A. Shah (Bombay High Court) S. 50C Capital Gains: The valuation of the stamp autho...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Supreme Court (SC) [1] on availability of CENVAT Credit on mobile towers and pre-fabrica...
-
IFRS and US GAAP - Similarities and Differences What is IFRS? And what is GAAP? The main difference between IFRS and US GAAP is that G...
-
Madras HC reverses ITAT's order, grants deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) to assessee (a society engaged in the business of banking and provi...
-
SC dismisses assessee-company’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order upholding re-assessment initiation (beyond 4 yrs period) based on a special...
-
SC dismisses Revenue’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order in case of assessee (belonging to Lodha group of companies engaged in real estate bu...
-
Claiming a foreign tax credit (FTC) in Australia allows companies to offset foreign taxes paid on income earned overseas against their Aust...
-
HC allows HDFC Bank’s writ petition, quashes AO’s order and subsequent reference to TPO alleging that certain related party transactions [p...
-
Delhi ITAT deletes Rs. 1558.57 cr. capital gains addition on Telenor India for AY 2014-15, holds that set off of non-refundable entry fee p...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Bombay High Court (HC)1 on admissibility of input tax credit (ITC) w.r.t GST on advance p...
No comments:
Post a Comment