SC issues notice to Revenue
in appeal against Delhi CESTAT decision which confirmed excise duty demand on
HR coils that were cut away during manufacture of MS spirally welded pipes;
While affirming the adjudication order, CESTAT had rejected assessee’s claim
that slitting of HR coils was a separate process which did not amount to
manufacture; Appreciating the process of manufacture of spirally welded pipes,
CESTAT had noted that cutting away of uneven edge of HR coils could not be
considered as independent process inasmuch as it was process carried out by way
of preparation in continuous process leading to finished product, viz. pipes;
There was no dispute that pieces of HR coils which were cut away were nothing
but scrap, it had to be considered as emerging in the manufacture of finished
product only and therefore, the same was liable to excise duty; CESTAT had also
rejected assessee’s claim of benefit under Notification No. 89/95-CE which
exempted waste and scrap arising in course of manufacture of exempted goods,
observing that while assessee claimed exemption under Notification No.
6/2006-CE to clear pipes, it also cleared goods on payment of excise duty :
SC
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Section 54F Survives Family Connection: ITAT Backs Genuine Intra-Family Property Transaction
In a recent ruling, the Hon'ble Mumbai Tribunal examined the availability of deduction under Section 54F of the Income-tax Act, 1961 w...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
Selling a property can trigger a significant tax liability in the form of capital gains tax. However, the Income-tax Act, 1961, allows you...
-
The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal has recently notified the Income-tax (Appellate Tribunal) Amendment Rules, 2025, introducing important p...
-
The Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime continues to evolve through judicial interpretations. From the Supreme Court to various High Court...
-
The Indian tax landscape has witnessed several significant judicial pronouncements in recent months. From the Supreme Court to various Hig...
-
Sr No Due Date Related to Compliance to be made 1 11.07.2026 GST ...
-
In the case of "Maya Gopinathan vs Anoop SB 2024 INSC 334," the Hon'ble Supreme Court provided insightful guidance on the de...
-
In a significant development, the Supreme Court has dismissed the Revenue’s Special Leave Petition (SLP) challenging a Bombay High Court (...
-
For Non-Resident Indians (NRIs) planning to move back home, the relocation is only half the journey. The other half is understanding how t...
-
This is to update you on procedure prescribed by the Office of the Development Commissioner, Karnataka Sub Zone (the “Office”) to be foll...
No comments:
Post a Comment