1. GST on the common cost of different
branches/ units
· Decision of AAAR is binding only to Columbia Asia.
·
Employee
is an employee of a company and not any particular location of the company.
·
Schedule
III of CGST Act 2017 exempt service of the employee
from GST
·
Hence
there cannot be any logic to cross charge employee cost within the organization
& charge GST on the same.
·
Supreme
court also held that what cannot be done directly , cannot be done indirectly
& hence cross charge between branches for common expenses is not possible.
2. GST on sales made by overseas
branches.
·
As
per section 7(1)(b) the amount remitted to overseas branches is to meet the expenses of the branches and not
for any consideration of service & hence in the absence of any supply,
there cannot be any GST.
3. Reversal of GST input credit for
having income from investment.
·
Income
from investment are not outside the scope of definition of supply
·
Hence
it is incorrect to considered the same
as exempt supply.
·
Rule
42 & 43 come to play only when there is taxable & non taxable supplies.
·
Hence
there cannot be any disallowance for input credit towards income from
investment.
4. Reversal of GST input credit for
having overseas branch operation.
·
Transaction
between overseas branch & overseas customer is not supply for India GST. (Refer Entry 7 of III
schedule)
·
The
same is outside the definition of supply and hence no reversal of input credit.
5. GST on notice pay recovered from
employees.
·
Notice
pay is an act agreed in advance and not an tolerance of an act or a situation.
·
Hence
notice pay cannot be termed as supply
& no GST.
No comments:
Post a Comment