GE Capital Us Holdings Inc Vs DCIT
Case Number: W.P.(C) 1646/2022 Facts: 1. The assessee, a non-resident entity involved in the business of providing IT and IT support services including software licenses to Indian entities, was classified as transfer of intellectual property, and assessed to tax on the payments received from these entities as royalty in terms of Section 9(1)(vi) of the Income tax Act read with Article 12 of the India-USA DTAA. 2. Consequently, penalty proceedings were also initiated u/s 270A. Even though the assessee had availed MAP for AY 2017-2018, paid the demands for AY 2018-2019 and 2019-2020, and filed application for immunity u/s 270AA, the AO rejected the application stating mere payment of demand does not, ipso facto, amount to protection against misreporting as envisaged by section 270A(9). 3. The assessee maintained that non-payment of tax was due to uncertainty in legal position existing at the time of filing the return of income and so penalty proceedings be dropped. Hon Delhi HC held as below: 1. The non-payment of tax by assessee due to uncertainty in legal position existing at the time of filing the return of income, would be outside the scope of 'mis-reporting'. 2. Show Cause Notice which came to be issued for commencement of action u/s 270A were themselves vague and unclear, as it failed to specify whether the assessee was being charged with under-reporting or misreporting of income. 3. While examining an application for immunity, it was incumbent upon the AO to ascertain whether the provisions of Section 270A stood attracted either on the anvil of under-reporting or misreporting. 4. A finding of misrepresentation, failure to record investments, expenditure not substantiated by evidence, recording of false entry in the books of account alluded to u/s 270A(9) has neither been returned nor recorded in the assessment order. 5. The penalty proceedings u/s 270A be dropped, due to AO's failure to allude to specific charge of misreporting or under-reporting in show cause notice.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Is Opting for Section 115BAA Like a Life Sentence? Debunking the Myth
The introduction of Section 115BAA under the Income Tax Act, 1961 offered a lucrative flat tax rate for domestic companies in exchange for f...
-
Section Particulars TDS Rate Individual/ HUF (Indian Resident)(in %) TDS Rate for (NRI) in India (in %) ...
-
In this post, I will discuss Secretarial Standards related to Proxies under SS – 2. Right to Appoint: A Member entitled to attend and ...
-
Slump sale is transfer of one or more business undertakings for a lump sum consideration, without assigning individual values to the each...
-
Particulars in Part 1 and Part 2 of Step-2 of registration form are required to be exactly the same as reported in the TDS statement. Plea...
-
· SC dismisses SLP to hold that capital reduction leads to transfer of shares and exigible to capital gains taxation
-
Regulatory Updates: Customs Regulations: The DGFT revised the Handbook of Procedures for the General Authorization for Export after Repair...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes the recent Notification [1] and Circular [2] issued by Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) addr...
-
Key Points Article 13: Capital Gains Taxation Article 13(4): Exempts capital gains from taxation in India for residen...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
The circular of the Board dt. 28.06.1965 No. 17 (XL-36), provides for inspection fees and fees for certified copies of assessment and...
No comments:
Post a Comment