AAR holds that services of
transportation, in-transit insurance and loading / unloading in relation to
separate contract for supply of materials at ex-factory price, shall be liable
to GST at rate applicable to supply of goods; Notes that supply of goods under
First Contract cannot be executed independent of Second Contract providing for
transportation for the former does not include the provision and cost of
transportation and delivery; Moreover, the two contracts are linked by a cross
fall breach clause that specifies that breach of one contract will be deemed to
be a breach of other contract, and thereby turn them into a single source
responsibility contract; Resultantly, observes that the two promises – supply
of goods and their transportation to contractee’s site – are not separately
enforceable, the supplies of goods and services are naturally bundled;
Accordingly, states, “…supplies as that of applicant’s should be construed as
specifically mentioned under the GST Act as Composite Supply with supply of
goods as the principal supply and services like transportation, in-transit
insurance etc ancillary or incidental to the principal supply...” : West Bengal
AAR
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
CBDT issues second round of frequently asked questions in relation to Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024
This Tax Alert summarizes Circular No. 19/2024 dated 16 December 2024 (VSV 2- December Circular) issued by the Central Board of Direct Tax...
-
PCIT vs. The Executor of Estate of Late Smt. Manjula A. Shah (Bombay High Court) S. 50C Capital Gains: The valuation of the stamp autho...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Supreme Court (SC) [1] on availability of CENVAT Credit on mobile towers and pre-fabrica...
-
IFRS and US GAAP - Similarities and Differences What is IFRS? And what is GAAP? The main difference between IFRS and US GAAP is that G...
-
Madras HC reverses ITAT's order, grants deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) to assessee (a society engaged in the business of banking and provi...
-
SC dismisses assessee-company’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order upholding re-assessment initiation (beyond 4 yrs period) based on a special...
-
SC dismisses Revenue’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order in case of assessee (belonging to Lodha group of companies engaged in real estate bu...
-
Claiming a foreign tax credit (FTC) in Australia allows companies to offset foreign taxes paid on income earned overseas against their Aust...
-
HC allows HDFC Bank’s writ petition, quashes AO’s order and subsequent reference to TPO alleging that certain related party transactions [p...
-
Delhi ITAT deletes Rs. 1558.57 cr. capital gains addition on Telenor India for AY 2014-15, holds that set off of non-refundable entry fee p...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Bombay High Court (HC)1 on admissibility of input tax credit (ITC) w.r.t GST on advance p...
No comments:
Post a Comment