AAR holds that payment
received by the Applicant (a US based technology company) from its India based
group company under the non-exclusive Reseller Agreement for
sale of applicant's content delivery solutions directly to customers in
India, not taxable as FTS/FIS or Royalty under the Act or
India-US DTAA; Accepts Applicant’s contention that the Solutions provided
by it are in the nature of a 'standard facility' and do not cater to
individual requirements of the customer, moreover absent human intervention it
cannot be termed as FTS under Explanation 2 to Sec. 9(1)(vii) of the Act, also
holds that the Solutions provided do not 'make available' knowledge to
the end user so as to fall under definition of FIS under Article 12 of DTAA;
Further holds that “when payments under Reseller Agreement are not towards
any IPR/Trademarks, it cannot be covered within the definition of royalty”,
also observes that Reseller Services Agreement does not contemplate
providing any kind of a software “product” to any of its customers or to the
Reseller; Distinguishes Revenue’s reliance on ABB FZ ruling which was rendered
in the context of use/sharing of specialized knowledge, expertise, etc. by
assessee through its employees, observes in present case there is no
use/sharing of knowledge, information, etc. by the Applicant with the Reseller
or the end user, likewise distinguishes Revenue’s reliance on various of
rulings including Samsung-Synopsis ruling, Vodafone South and Verizon rulings
on facts; With respect to PE, AAR clarifies that “once we have ruled
above that income does not accrue or arise in the hands of the Applicant as
Royalty or FTS/FIS…the question of existence of a PE under Article 5 becomes
irrelevant and academic, as no income can be attributed to it, if at all there
was one.”:AAR
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Taxability of online games
Introduction: 1. Taxability of online winnings before the introduction of section 115BBJ of the Income Tax Act and section 194BA of the Inco...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
This is to update you about an important decision by Tribunal in the case of Filatex India Limited vs. CCE & ST , E A No. 10231 of ...
-
LEASE-DEED (A brief Introduction) Lease defined. A lease of immovable property is a transfer of a right to enjoy such property, mad...
-
Introduction It's important for taxpayers to have a clear understanding of the available allowances and deductions, as they can grea...
-
· Mumbai ITAT in the case of Mukesh Harilal Mehta held that Exemption U/S 54 cannot be denied merely due to mistake by the developer.
-
We all are currently in the process of submitting Rectification Applications under Section 161 of GST Laws for errors that are evident fro...
-
Earlier this year, the Mauritius Government approved the amendment to the India – Mauritius tax treaty, aligning it with the proposal of th...
-
Particulars in Part 1 and Part 2 of Step-2 of registration form are required to be exactly the same as reported in the TDS statement. Plea...
-
Introduction The law relating to companies is laid down in Companies Act, 2013 and the rules made thereunder and t...
-
Slump sale is transfer of one or more business undertakings for a lump sum consideration, without assigning individual values to the each...
No comments:
Post a Comment