HC
dismisses writ petition challenging order passed by Asst. DGFT denying the
benefit of ‘Served from India Scheme’ (SFIS) to assessee rendering hospitality
service, on the premise that it was promoting a foreign brand; Rejects
assessee’s plea that said order lacks jurisdiction and competency and no
fruitful purpose would be served in preferring appeal as Director General
himself had earlier taken a decision contrary to assessee’s interest, which has
been quashed by Delhi HC and therefore, preferring an appeal would be an empty
formality; Perusing Section 15 of FT (D&R) Act, HC elucidates that
provision stipulated thereunder is unambiguous that any decision taken or order
passed by the Adjudicating Authority is appealable u/s 15(1) either before the
Director General or any authorised officer superior to Adjudicating Authority;
Remarks, “Law is an evolving procedure and the pragmatic approach by the Courts
as well as by the authorities are certainly in growing nature. In a developing
nation, the field of law is also being developed by new ideas and
thoughts…..apprehension…that the authority will confine himself only in respect
of the previous decision, cannot be accepted nor shall form a basis for not
exhausting the remedies provided under the Statute”; A decision taken by DGFT at
an earlier occasion will not preclude him from reconsidering issues nor
assessee can come to a conclusion that DGFT is incompetent to re-adjudicate the
issues, observes HC while stating that, “all the intermittent interventions and
the writ petitions filed without exhausting the remedies prescribed under the
Statutes need not be entertained in all circumstances in a routine manner” :
Madras HC
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
CBDT issues second round of frequently asked questions in relation to Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024
This Tax Alert summarizes Circular No. 19/2024 dated 16 December 2024 (VSV 2- December Circular) issued by the Central Board of Direct Tax...
-
PCIT vs. The Executor of Estate of Late Smt. Manjula A. Shah (Bombay High Court) S. 50C Capital Gains: The valuation of the stamp autho...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Supreme Court (SC) [1] on availability of CENVAT Credit on mobile towers and pre-fabrica...
-
IFRS and US GAAP - Similarities and Differences What is IFRS? And what is GAAP? The main difference between IFRS and US GAAP is that G...
-
Madras HC reverses ITAT's order, grants deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) to assessee (a society engaged in the business of banking and provi...
-
SC dismisses assessee-company’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order upholding re-assessment initiation (beyond 4 yrs period) based on a special...
-
SC dismisses Revenue’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order in case of assessee (belonging to Lodha group of companies engaged in real estate bu...
-
Claiming a foreign tax credit (FTC) in Australia allows companies to offset foreign taxes paid on income earned overseas against their Aust...
-
HC allows HDFC Bank’s writ petition, quashes AO’s order and subsequent reference to TPO alleging that certain related party transactions [p...
-
Delhi ITAT deletes Rs. 1558.57 cr. capital gains addition on Telenor India for AY 2014-15, holds that set off of non-refundable entry fee p...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Bombay High Court (HC)1 on admissibility of input tax credit (ITC) w.r.t GST on advance p...
No comments:
Post a Comment