Pune
ITAT accepts assessee’s (land owner) plea that advance received from
developer towards flat booking shall not be taxable in subject AY 2009-10 on
receipt basis, but in subsequent AY when the project was completed and
tenements / flats were handed over to the prospective buyers; Notes that the
assessee had given the land for development and was entitled to receive 18% on
gross sales under the terms of development agreement (‘DA’); With
respect to advance booking amount received in subject AY, ITAT remarks
that “The said amount received by the assessee is an advance receipt
because the right to collect the said amount would crystallize on the day when
the tenants or portion of land is sold by the developer to the prospective
buyers.”; Moreover, observes that the developer recognized the completion
and sale of developed portion in subsequent AY 2011-12, consequently, holds
that the business profits arising to assessee were taxable in such year;
Lastly, ITAT clarifies that since the amount is not assessable to tax as his
business profits in subject AY, the capital gains arising on conversion of
capital asset into stock-in-trade is also not to be taxed in the hands of
assessee in subject AY but in the year in which the business profits are to be
taxed:ITAT
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
CBDT issues second round of frequently asked questions in relation to Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024
This Tax Alert summarizes Circular No. 19/2024 dated 16 December 2024 (VSV 2- December Circular) issued by the Central Board of Direct Tax...
-
PCIT vs. The Executor of Estate of Late Smt. Manjula A. Shah (Bombay High Court) S. 50C Capital Gains: The valuation of the stamp autho...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Supreme Court (SC) [1] on availability of CENVAT Credit on mobile towers and pre-fabrica...
-
IFRS and US GAAP - Similarities and Differences What is IFRS? And what is GAAP? The main difference between IFRS and US GAAP is that G...
-
Madras HC reverses ITAT's order, grants deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) to assessee (a society engaged in the business of banking and provi...
-
SC dismisses assessee-company’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order upholding re-assessment initiation (beyond 4 yrs period) based on a special...
-
SC dismisses Revenue’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order in case of assessee (belonging to Lodha group of companies engaged in real estate bu...
-
Claiming a foreign tax credit (FTC) in Australia allows companies to offset foreign taxes paid on income earned overseas against their Aust...
-
HC allows HDFC Bank’s writ petition, quashes AO’s order and subsequent reference to TPO alleging that certain related party transactions [p...
-
Delhi ITAT deletes Rs. 1558.57 cr. capital gains addition on Telenor India for AY 2014-15, holds that set off of non-refundable entry fee p...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Bombay High Court (HC)1 on admissibility of input tax credit (ITC) w.r.t GST on advance p...
No comments:
Post a Comment