SC allows Revenue's appeal,
holds that material found in the course of simultaneous survey in the premises
of builder with whom assessee had transaction, can be used in assessee's block
assessment u/s 153A; Search was conducted at the premises of assessee between
July 17, 2002 and August 21, 2002 and simultaneous survey was carried on at
premises of ECIL (builder and decorator who had constructed and decorated
assessee's house) wherein it was found that assessee had paid in cash Rs. 95.16
lakhs to ECIL which was not accounted for, accordingly AO assessed this amount as
income in block assessment on assessee for period April 1, 1996 to July 17,
2002; SC notes that in order to add any income in the block assessment,
evidence of such must be found in the course of search u/s 132 or in any
proceedings simultaneously conducted in the premises of the assessee, relatives
or persons who are connected with assessee and are having transaction/dealings
with such assessee; Takes note of the provision of Sec 158BH under which other
provisions of Income-tax Act are made applicable to block assessment, thus
holds that any material or evidence found/collected in a survey u/s 133A which
has been simultaneously made at the premises of a connected person can be
utilized while making the Block Assessment in respect of assessee u/s 158BB r.w.s
158BH; Observes that "The same would fall under the words 'and such other
materials or information as are available with the Assessing Officer and
relatable to such evidence' occurring in Section158 BB of the Act"; Thus,
holds that AO was justified in taking into account the adverse material found
during the survey while making the Block Assessment, sets aside HC order and
restores AO's order of block assessment:SC
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
CBDT issues second round of frequently asked questions in relation to Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024
This Tax Alert summarizes Circular No. 19/2024 dated 16 December 2024 (VSV 2- December Circular) issued by the Central Board of Direct Tax...
-
PCIT vs. The Executor of Estate of Late Smt. Manjula A. Shah (Bombay High Court) S. 50C Capital Gains: The valuation of the stamp autho...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Supreme Court (SC) [1] on availability of CENVAT Credit on mobile towers and pre-fabrica...
-
IFRS and US GAAP - Similarities and Differences What is IFRS? And what is GAAP? The main difference between IFRS and US GAAP is that G...
-
Madras HC reverses ITAT's order, grants deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) to assessee (a society engaged in the business of banking and provi...
-
SC dismisses assessee-company’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order upholding re-assessment initiation (beyond 4 yrs period) based on a special...
-
SC dismisses Revenue’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order in case of assessee (belonging to Lodha group of companies engaged in real estate bu...
-
Claiming a foreign tax credit (FTC) in Australia allows companies to offset foreign taxes paid on income earned overseas against their Aust...
-
HC allows HDFC Bank’s writ petition, quashes AO’s order and subsequent reference to TPO alleging that certain related party transactions [p...
-
Delhi ITAT deletes Rs. 1558.57 cr. capital gains addition on Telenor India for AY 2014-15, holds that set off of non-refundable entry fee p...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Bombay High Court (HC)1 on admissibility of input tax credit (ITC) w.r.t GST on advance p...
No comments:
Post a Comment