SC issues notice to Revenue
upon SLP filed by assessee against HC's denial to grant extension of time for
payment of third installment under the Income Tax Declaration Scheme, 2016
[IDS,2016]; The assessee had filed declaration of undisclosed income under the
IDS, 2016 but was unable to pay the third instalment of tax, surcharge and
penalty within the stipulated time and had sought extension of time before HC
by way of a writ petition, which was rejected;HC had ruled that mere
involvement in office work and marketing activities cannot be a good
justification and ground to seek and ask for extension of time; HC had further
held that “the petitioners have not made out an extraordinary case which would
have justified invoking writ jurisdiction and grant of further time beyond the
time, even assuming that the time stipulated under the Scheme could be extended
by the Board u/s. 119(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.”;SC lists the matter
after two weeks from the date of this order and in the interim, directs
assessee to deposit the tax under third instalment with interest @ 12%p.a. till
date.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
India-Mauritius DTAA Protocol Notified: Key Tax Implications
The Government of India has notified the amendment to the Protocol of the India-Mauritius Double Tax Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) on 13 Oct...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
In a recent informal guidance letter, SEBI clarified whether a cousin of a Promoter Group member qualifies as a person ‘related to promote...
-
Slump sale is transfer of one or more business undertakings for a lump sum consideration, without assigning individual values to the each...
-
Key features of File Validation Utility (FVU) version 3.3 FVU 3.3 will be applicable for quarterly TDS/ TCS statements pertaining to...
-
CIT vs. The Instalment Supply Ltd (Delhi High Court) The assessee bought 1614 items of computer systems for Rs.40 lacs from HCL Hewlett ...
-
Facts The applicant („A‟) is a closely held Public Limited company incorporated in India in the year 1953. A‟s shareholder included A (...
-
01. TDS u/s 194J is required to be done for Royalty also w.e.f 13-7-2006. 02. Royalty had been defined under explanation 2 of se...
-
Until now, 'Samaritans' is not how the Independent Directors are purported by Clause 49 in the Listing agreement. An Independ...
-
1. Concept of “limited liability partnership” LLP is an alternative corporate business form that gives the benefits of limited liability ...
-
SREI Infrastructure Finance Ltd vs. ITSC (Delhi High Court) The assessee entered into a scheme of arrangement u/s 391-394 of the Compani...
No comments:
Post a Comment