Bombay HC upholds ITAT
order, rules that assessee company’s transfer of entire shareholding in its
subsidiary to third party doesn’t constitute slump sale u/s 2(42C) r.w. Sec
50B, cites distinction between transfer of shares and transfer of undertaking;
Revenue had treated the transaction as a slump sale u/s 2(42C) on the ground
that sale of 100% shares of any company would lead to a change of ownership and
management which is similar to a slump sale and had thus invoked Sec 50B as
against long term capital gains claimed by assessee u/s 48; Rejecting Revenue’s
stand, HC observes that “what has been transferred are mere shares” of
subsidiary company and there has been no transfer of an undertaking; HC remarks
that “Only there has been change in pattern of its share holdings which would
not make it slump sale” which is evident from the statutory definition of slump
sale and the term 'undertaking' as defined in the Act read with the binding
decision of the Apex Court in Bacha F. Guzdar; Upholding ITAT order, HC holds
that “Tribunal invoked the correct principle of law to draw a distinction
between transfer of shares and transfer of undertaking” and concludes that no
substantial question of law arises.:HC
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Requirement to dematerialize shares of private limited companies
The Ministry of Corporate Affairs in October 2023 had mandated private companies and their shareholders to dematerialize their shareholding...
-
Particulars in Part 1 and Part 2 of Step-2 of registration form are required to be exactly the same as reported in the TDS statement. Plea...
-
1. Introduction: Every trust/charitable society/ NGO that wishes to claim the tax exemption benefits has to file Form 10A to seek fresh re...
-
LEASE-DEED (A brief Introduction) Lease defined. A lease of immovable property is a transfer of a right to enjoy such property, mad...
-
NECESSITY : Sometimes, in view of the expansion of the business, multiple increase in turnover and need for getting finances from the ...
-
· Mumbai ITAT in the case of Mukesh Harilal Mehta held that Exemption U/S 54 cannot be denied merely due to mistake by the developer.
-
Filing income tax returns (ITR) within the specified timelines under the Income-tax Act is not just a legal obligation but also crucial fo...
-
Earlier this year, the Mauritius Government approved the amendment to the India – Mauritius tax treaty, aligning it with the proposal of th...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent instruction issued by the SEZ Division, Department of Commerce, clarifying various concerns relating t...
-
Slump sale is transfer of one or more business undertakings for a lump sum consideration, without assigning individual values to the each...
-
Section 17(5)(c) and (d) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, blocks input tax credit for works contract services, goods or serv...
No comments:
Post a Comment