Chennai ITAT denies
assessee-partner’s claim of estimating income on presumptive basis u/s. 44AD
with respect to interest and remuneration earned from the partnership firms
during AY 2012-13; While filing return of income, assessee had applied
presumptive rate @ 8% u/s 44AD on interest and remuneration received from
various partnership firms, however, AO had denied the claim on the ground
that assessee was not doing any business independently but was only a partner
in the firms; Referring to Sec. 28(v) read with Section 40(b), ITAT
acknowledges that remuneration and interest received from a firm, to the extent
eligible u/s 40(b), would be considered as ‘profits and gains from business or
profession’ of the recipient partner; However, ITAT clarifies that “This by
itself…would not translate such remuneration and interest, to gross receipts or
turnover …of a business independently carried on by a partner.”; ITAT opines
that the intention of insertion of Sec. 44AD was to help small business to
comply with the taxation provisions and that the “Intention was not at all to
construe a partner’s remuneration or interest as business income.”:ITAT
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
India-Mauritius DTAA Protocol Notified: Key Tax Implications
The Government of India has notified the amendment to the Protocol of the India-Mauritius Double Tax Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) on 13 Oct...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
In a recent informal guidance letter, SEBI clarified whether a cousin of a Promoter Group member qualifies as a person ‘related to promote...
-
Slump sale is transfer of one or more business undertakings for a lump sum consideration, without assigning individual values to the each...
-
Key features of File Validation Utility (FVU) version 3.3 FVU 3.3 will be applicable for quarterly TDS/ TCS statements pertaining to...
-
CIT vs. The Instalment Supply Ltd (Delhi High Court) The assessee bought 1614 items of computer systems for Rs.40 lacs from HCL Hewlett ...
-
Facts The applicant („A‟) is a closely held Public Limited company incorporated in India in the year 1953. A‟s shareholder included A (...
-
01. TDS u/s 194J is required to be done for Royalty also w.e.f 13-7-2006. 02. Royalty had been defined under explanation 2 of se...
-
Until now, 'Samaritans' is not how the Independent Directors are purported by Clause 49 in the Listing agreement. An Independ...
-
1. Concept of “limited liability partnership” LLP is an alternative corporate business form that gives the benefits of limited liability ...
-
SREI Infrastructure Finance Ltd vs. ITSC (Delhi High Court) The assessee entered into a scheme of arrangement u/s 391-394 of the Compani...
No comments:
Post a Comment