Bombay HC dismisses
Revenue’s appeal against ITAT’s order allowing Sec. 10B benefit to
assessee-firm (a 100% EOU), engaged in manufacturing of diamond studded gold
jewellery, rules that absence of plant and machinery would not lead to a
conclusion that there was no ‘manufacturing’ activity; During subject AY
2010-11, AO had denied deduction on the ground that no manufacturing
activity was carried out by assessee as there was no machinery available at its
premises, as also a small amount of labour charges were incurred as against the
large turnover; HC notes that as per ITAT’s findings, the Government had
granted permission to assessee to manufacture handmade jewellery, and that the
process of making diamond studded jewellery does not require machinery; Also on
the quantum of labour charges and wages being the basis of disallowance, HC
refers to ITAT’s finding that the Revenue had not carried out any examination /
enquiry to ascertain what would be the fair market value of the labour charges
and wages in this sort of activity; Thus, HC holds that view taken by the
Tribunal is one of finding of fact and is a possible view, which does not give
rise to any substantial question of law.:HC
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Gujarat High Court reaffirms mandatory right to personal hearing in Faceless Assessments
Recently, the Hon’ble Gujarat High Court in B.M. Developers v. Assessment Unit of Income-tax Department ruled in favor of the taxpayer and...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
Selling a property can trigger a significant tax liability in the form of capital gains tax. However, the Income-tax Act, 1961, allows you...
-
Clarifications from the GST Council The GST Council has recommended the following clarifications on ISD and cross charge:
-
The Indian tax landscape has witnessed several significant judicial pronouncements in recent months. From the Supreme Court to various Hig...
-
The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal has recently notified the Income-tax (Appellate Tribunal) Amendment Rules, 2025, introducing important p...
-
The Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime continues to evolve through judicial interpretations. From the Supreme Court to various High Court...
-
Sr No Due Date Related to Compliance to be made 1 11.07.2026 GST ...
-
In the case of "Maya Gopinathan vs Anoop SB 2024 INSC 334," the Hon'ble Supreme Court provided insightful guidance on the de...
-
In a significant development, the Supreme Court has dismissed the Revenue’s Special Leave Petition (SLP) challenging a Bombay High Court (...
-
For Non-Resident Indians (NRIs) planning to move back home, the relocation is only half the journey. The other half is understanding how t...
No comments:
Post a Comment