Bombay HC dismisses
Revenue’s appeal against ITAT’s order allowing Sec. 10B benefit to
assessee-firm (a 100% EOU), engaged in manufacturing of diamond studded gold
jewellery, rules that absence of plant and machinery would not lead to a
conclusion that there was no ‘manufacturing’ activity; During subject AY
2010-11, AO had denied deduction on the ground that no manufacturing
activity was carried out by assessee as there was no machinery available at its
premises, as also a small amount of labour charges were incurred as against the
large turnover; HC notes that as per ITAT’s findings, the Government had
granted permission to assessee to manufacture handmade jewellery, and that the
process of making diamond studded jewellery does not require machinery; Also on
the quantum of labour charges and wages being the basis of disallowance, HC
refers to ITAT’s finding that the Revenue had not carried out any examination /
enquiry to ascertain what would be the fair market value of the labour charges
and wages in this sort of activity; Thus, HC holds that view taken by the
Tribunal is one of finding of fact and is a possible view, which does not give
rise to any substantial question of law.:HC
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Navigating Section 79: How Continuity of Beneficial Ownership Preserves Loss Carry-Forward
A recent ruling by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in ACIT vs. Lurgi India International Services Pvt. Ltd. provides crucial ...
-
Introduction: ADR’S, GDR’S: These are commonly known as Depository Receipts (‘DR’), a negotiable security issued outside India by a deposi...
-
The Approving Panel under General Anti-Avoidance Rules (GAAR), in a landmark direction, has characterized the demerger of Digital, Media a...
-
Particulars in Part 1 and Part 2 of Step-2 of registration form are required to be exactly the same as reported in the TDS statement. Plea...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
In the case of "Maya Gopinathan vs Anoop SB 2024 INSC 334," the Hon'ble Supreme Court provided insightful guidance on the de...
-
An eminent concern within the GST framework pertains to the entitlement of Input Tax Credit (ITC) concerning expenditures associated with In...
-
The Hon’ble Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai Bench (‘Tribunal’) recently held that long-term capital gains (LTCG) arising to Fullerto...
-
Introduction Employee welfare is a cornerstone of corporate responsibility, and gratuity forms a critical part of the social security benefi...
-
A recent discussion with a colleague highlighted a key international tax dilemma: when an Indian company buys back shares from a non-residen...
-
In Standard Castings Private Limited v. ITO , the Hon’ble ITAT Delhi allowed the assessee’s appeal and set aside a demand that had continu...
No comments:
Post a Comment