Delhi HC condones assessee
company’s delay in filing application u/s. 119(2)(b) seeking refund of TDS
amount for AY 2013-14; Takes note of assessee’s submission that its Chartered
Accountant / auditor had inadvertently overlooked the TDS amount while filing
the return, holds assessee’s reasons as being ‘bonafide’; On Revenue’s
stand that the auditor’s omission was not substantiated, HC remarks that, “This
court has difficulty to understand what more plea or proof any assessee could
have brought on record, to substantiate the inadvertence of its advisor.”;
Noting that the assessee did not urge any other grounds such as illness of
someone etc., which could have reasonably been substantiated by independent
material, HC remarks that, “there cannot necessarily be independent proof or
material to establish that the auditor in fact acted without diligence.”;
Moreover, HC observes that the amount was reflected on the TDS portal of IT
Dept. at the relevant time, thus permits assessee to make refund claim and
directs AO to remit the amount due within three weeks time after due verification,
cites co-ordinate bench ruling in Indglonal Investment & Finance Ltd.:HC
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
India-Mauritius DTAA Protocol Notified: Key Tax Implications
The Government of India has notified the amendment to the Protocol of the India-Mauritius Double Tax Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) on 13 Oct...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
In a recent informal guidance letter, SEBI clarified whether a cousin of a Promoter Group member qualifies as a person ‘related to promote...
-
Slump sale is transfer of one or more business undertakings for a lump sum consideration, without assigning individual values to the each...
-
Key features of File Validation Utility (FVU) version 3.3 FVU 3.3 will be applicable for quarterly TDS/ TCS statements pertaining to...
-
CIT vs. The Instalment Supply Ltd (Delhi High Court) The assessee bought 1614 items of computer systems for Rs.40 lacs from HCL Hewlett ...
-
Facts The applicant („A‟) is a closely held Public Limited company incorporated in India in the year 1953. A‟s shareholder included A (...
-
01. TDS u/s 194J is required to be done for Royalty also w.e.f 13-7-2006. 02. Royalty had been defined under explanation 2 of se...
-
Until now, 'Samaritans' is not how the Independent Directors are purported by Clause 49 in the Listing agreement. An Independ...
-
1. Concept of “limited liability partnership” LLP is an alternative corporate business form that gives the benefits of limited liability ...
-
SREI Infrastructure Finance Ltd vs. ITSC (Delhi High Court) The assessee entered into a scheme of arrangement u/s 391-394 of the Compani...
No comments:
Post a Comment