| CIT vs. Atma Ram Properties Pvt. Ltd (Supreme Court) |
| Liberty is given to the Department to move the High Court pointing out that the Circular dated 9th February, 2011, should not be applied ipso facto, particularly, when the matter has a cascading effect. There are cases under the Income Tax Act, 1961, in which a common principle may be involved in subsequent group of matters or large number of matters. In our view, in such cases if attention of the High Court is drawn, the High Court will not apply the Circular ipso facto (Surya Herbal reiterated). |
Tuesday, 18 September 2012
Low Tax Effect Circular cannot apply "Ipso Facto"
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
In this article, for the benefit of our reader’s we have come up with detailed FAQ on procedures of issuance, requirement of Form 15CA an...
-
1. Situation I. Tax Department Summons An employee received a summons from the tax department demanding an explanation for failing to discl...
-
Particulars in Part 1 and Part 2 of Step-2 of registration form are required to be exactly the same as reported in the TDS statement. Plea...
-
In this post, I will discuss Secretarial Standards related to Proxies under SS – 2. Right to Appoint: A Member entitled to attend and ...
-
Many of us rely on home loans to purchase residential property, but are you fully aware of how tax laws impact your financial strategy? Unde...
-
Summary of the relevant updates is provided below for ease of your reference: A) Proposals relating to GST law, Compliances an...
-
Particulars Singapore Hong Kong Corporate Tax rate 17% 16.5%. Numb...
-
The circular of the Board dt. 28.06.1965 No. 17 (XL-36), provides for inspection fees and fees for certified copies of assessment and...
-
Recently, a few announcements made by our Finance Minister, Nirmala Sitharaman, sparked widespread discussions, particularly in the retail a...
No comments:
Post a Comment