| 1. Subsequent ruling of SC not a valid ground to reopen an assessment passed in accordance with law as it stood at the relevant time Subsequent reversal of legal position by judgment of Supreme Court does not authorize department to re-open assessment, which stood closed on basis of law, as it stood at relevant time - DCIT v. Simplex Concrete Piles (India) Ltd. [2012] 25 taxmann.com 283 (SC) 2. Re-assessment notice isn't maintainable if it is based on an invalid rectification notice issued under sec. 154 When notice under section 154 was not maintainable, notice under section 148 on basis of said notice is also not maintainable - ACIT v. Shreyas Gramin Bank [2012] 25 taxmann.com 282 (SC) 3. Interest on loan for acquisition of a capital asset is deductible even if such asset isn't put to use in previous year Interest paid in respect of borrowings for acquisition of capital assets not put to use in concerned financial year can be allowed as deduction under section 36(1)(iii) - Vardhman Polytex Ltd. v. CIT[2012] 25 taxmann.com 281 (SC) 4. SC admonishes revenue for its laxity in filing of SLPs and appeals before HC for cases involving huge tax demands The Supreme Court observes that there was inordinate delay in filing appeals and SLPs where there was a question of huge demand which was resulting revenue leakage. In these circumstances, Supreme Court asked Additional Solicitor General as to whether Department intends to hold an inquiry for above delay - DIT v. CITI Bank N.A. [2012] 25 taxmann.com 297 (SC) |
Wednesday, 19 September 2012
Recent SUPREME COURT Rulings
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
GAAR Not Applicable to Genuine Capital Market Transactions: Telangana High Court
In a significant ruling, the Telangana High Court held that General Anti-Avoidance Rules (GAAR) cannot be invoked merely because a transacti...
-
Slump sale is transfer of one or more business undertakings for a lump sum consideration, without assigning individual values to the each...
-
Facts Centrica India Offshore Private Limited (CIO), an Indian Company, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Centrica Plc, UK Centrica Plc a...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
The Tax Audit season has started and it’s the time when the Assessees rush to their Chartered Accountants (CA) to get their Tax Audit d...
-
SREI Infrastructure Finance Ltd vs. ITSC (Delhi High Court) The assessee entered into a scheme of arrangement u/s 391-394 of the Compani...
-
Facts The taxpayer, a partnership firm, derived income from the business of handling and transport of ship containers, customs clearing a...
-
M/s. Alpha Projects Society P. Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) In AY 2005-06, the assessee made payments to contractors & for professi...
-
01. TDS u/s 194J is required to be done for Royalty also w.e.f 13-7-2006. 02. Royalty had been defined under explanation 2 of se...
-
F.No.354/66/2011-TRU Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Central Board of Excise & Customs...
-
M/s. Merilyn Shipping & Transports vs. ACIT (ITAT Visakhapatnam Special Bench) The assessee incurred brokerage expenses of Rs.38....
No comments:
Post a Comment