| Sandur Manganese and Iron Ores Ltd vs. CIT (Supreme Court) |
| The interpretation of Section 40A(9) of the Act clearly brings out a dichotomy between `contribution’ and `reimbursement’. Section 40A(9) of the Act was inserted by Finance Act No.2 of 1984. The Explanatory Memo to the Finance Bill, 1984 indicates the reasons why the word `contribution’ finds place in Section 40A of the Act. It appears that Section 40A(9) of the Act was inserted as a measure for combating tax avoidance. |
Thursday, 27 September 2012
S. 40A(9) applies to a "contribution" but not to "reimbursement"
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
In this article, for the benefit of our reader’s we have come up with detailed FAQ on procedures of issuance, requirement of Form 15CA an...
-
1. Situation I. Tax Department Summons An employee received a summons from the tax department demanding an explanation for failing to discl...
-
Particulars in Part 1 and Part 2 of Step-2 of registration form are required to be exactly the same as reported in the TDS statement. Plea...
-
In this post, I will discuss Secretarial Standards related to Proxies under SS – 2. Right to Appoint: A Member entitled to attend and ...
-
Many of us rely on home loans to purchase residential property, but are you fully aware of how tax laws impact your financial strategy? Unde...
-
Summary of the relevant updates is provided below for ease of your reference: A) Proposals relating to GST law, Compliances an...
-
Particulars Singapore Hong Kong Corporate Tax rate 17% 16.5%. Numb...
-
The circular of the Board dt. 28.06.1965 No. 17 (XL-36), provides for inspection fees and fees for certified copies of assessment and...
-
Recently, a few announcements made by our Finance Minister, Nirmala Sitharaman, sparked widespread discussions, particularly in the retail a...
No comments:
Post a Comment