Thursday, 27 September 2012

S. 40A(9) applies to a "contribution" but not to "reimbursement"

Sandur Manganese and Iron Ores Ltd vs. CIT (Supreme Court)
The interpretation of Section 40A(9) of the Act clearly brings out a dichotomy between `contribution’ and `reimbursement’. Section 40A(9) of the Act was inserted by Finance Act No.2 of 1984. The Explanatory Memo to the Finance Bill, 1984 indicates the reasons why the word `contribution’ finds place in Section 40A of the Act. It appears that Section 40A(9) of the Act was inserted as a measure for combating tax avoidance.

No comments:

ITAT Amendment Rules, 2025 – Key Procedural Changes and Practical Takeaways

  The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal has recently notified the Income-tax (Appellate Tribunal) Amendment Rules, 2025, introducing important p...