| Sandur Manganese and Iron Ores Ltd vs. CIT (Supreme Court) |
| The interpretation of Section 40A(9) of the Act clearly brings out a dichotomy between `contribution’ and `reimbursement’. Section 40A(9) of the Act was inserted by Finance Act No.2 of 1984. The Explanatory Memo to the Finance Bill, 1984 indicates the reasons why the word `contribution’ finds place in Section 40A of the Act. It appears that Section 40A(9) of the Act was inserted as a measure for combating tax avoidance. |
Thursday, 27 September 2012
S. 40A(9) applies to a "contribution" but not to "reimbursement"
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
Particulars in Part 1 and Part 2 of Step-2 of registration form are required to be exactly the same as reported in the TDS statement. Plea...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
In this post, I will discuss Secretarial Standards related to Proxies under SS – 2. Right to Appoint: A Member entitled to attend and ...
-
When India introduced the Goods and Services Tax (GST), it created a big change in the way companies handle their taxes. Earlier, business...
-
What is a Digital Signature? Answer: A digital signature authenticates electronic documents in a similar manner a handwritten signatur...
-
Companies often give gifts to their employees to boost morale, celebrate achievements, and promote a positive work environment. Such gifts ...
-
LEASE-DEED (A brief Introduction) Lease defined. A lease of immovable property is a transfer of a right to enjoy such property, mad...
-
Section 150 of the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2024, specifies that taxpayers will not receive refunds for taxes paid or input tax credits (ITC) re...
-
Overview The Supreme Court of India recently ruled on the applicability of the Most Favoured Nation (MFN) clause in tax treaties involvin...
No comments:
Post a Comment