Monday, 17 September 2012

Review Petition allowed & judgement recalled on issue of PE & profit attribution

The judgement in Rolls Royce Singapore Pvt Ltd vs. DCIT is recalled to decide the issue whether (a) ANR, which was the agent of the assessee, could be treated as the "permanent establishment: and (b) what would be the reasonable arms’ length price in the hands of ANR/ PE which can be assesssed in India.

Rolls Royce Singapore Pvt Ltd vs. DCIT (Delhi High Court)

No comments:

Refund of pre-deposit cannot be withheld merely because litigation continues on the balance demand

  In a significant judgment in IBM India Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India (2026-VIL-955-BOM), the Bombay High Court has reaffirmed an important p...