Thursday, 20 September 2012

S. 80-IB(10)(d) cap on commercial area inserted w.e.f. AY 2005-06 applies to projects approved earlier

ITO vs. Everest Home Construction (ITAT Mumbai)
Though the assessee’s project, when it was commenced in the year 2003, was in compliance with s. 80-IB(10) as it then stood, the law prevailing in the year of completion of the project has to be seen. As the Project breached the ceiling of maximum commercial area imposed by s. 80-IB(10)(d) inserted w.e.f. 1.4.2005 (lesser of 2000 sq. ft or 5% of aggregate BU area), the assessee is not eligible for s. 80-IB(10) relief (Saroj Sales Corp vs. ITO 115 TTJ Mum 485 not followed; Brahma Associates 333 ITR 289 (Bom) & Reliance Jute 120 ITR 921 (SC) referred)

No comments:

GAAR Not Applicable to Genuine Capital Market Transactions: Telangana High Court

In a significant ruling, the Telangana High Court held that General Anti-Avoidance Rules (GAAR) cannot be invoked merely because a transacti...