Delhi HC suspends demand
notice issued by DGFT officers seeking recovery of sanctioned SFIS benefits
under relevant FTP during the period 2003 to 2014; Demand had been raised
pursuant to Bombay HC ruling in Shri. Naman Hotels wherein it was held that SFIS
benefits cannot be availed by companies rendering services under foreign brand;
Court notes petitioner’s reliance on judgment in Simplex Infrastructure Ltd
which had followed Gujarat HC decision in Alstom India Ltd; Petitioner has
challenged vires of Rule 7(3) of Foreign Trade (Development &
Regulation) Rules, Para 7(10) of FTP, constitution of Policy Interpretation
Committee (PIC) for the period prior to 2012, while pleading that concerned
DGFT officers have no jurisdiction to issue such demand notice in contravention
of Section 16 of Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act; HC issues
notice to Revenue, and lists the matter for hearing on April 9, 2018 :
Delhi HC
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Section 56(2)(ix): Forfeiture of Advance Money Received – A Critical Analysis
The Dual Conditions for Taxability Section 56(2)(ix) of the Income Tax Act imposes tax liability on sums received as advance or otherwise du...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
Selling a property can trigger a significant tax liability in the form of capital gains tax. However, the Income-tax Act, 1961, allows you...
-
Clarifications from the GST Council The GST Council has recommended the following clarifications on ISD and cross charge:
-
The Indian tax landscape has witnessed several significant judicial pronouncements in recent months. From the Supreme Court to various Hig...
-
The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal has recently notified the Income-tax (Appellate Tribunal) Amendment Rules, 2025, introducing important p...
-
The Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime continues to evolve through judicial interpretations. From the Supreme Court to various High Court...
-
Sr No Due Date Related to Compliance to be made 1 11.07.2026 GST ...
-
In the case of "Maya Gopinathan vs Anoop SB 2024 INSC 334," the Hon'ble Supreme Court provided insightful guidance on the de...
-
For Non-Resident Indians (NRIs) planning to move back home, the relocation is only half the journey. The other half is understanding how t...
-
In a significant development, the Supreme Court has dismissed the Revenue’s Special Leave Petition (SLP) challenging a Bombay High Court (...
No comments:
Post a Comment