HC
holds that Joint Commissioner (Executive) (JC) is empowered to exercise
revisional powers comprised under Section 10B of U.P. Trade Tax Act 1948;
Rejects assessee’s plea that no notification has been issued by State
Government conferring such authority, acts and decisions of JC cannot be
validated or saved by application of “de facto” doctrine, hence exercise of
power by JC was invalid, liable to be viewed as a mere usurper of office;
Observes, a careful reading of Section 10B clearly establish that initially the
provision empowered the Commissioner or such other officer not below the rank
of Deputy Commissioner to exercise powers of revision and later words “Deputy
Commissioner” was substituted by words “Joint Commissioner”; States, fact that
Commissioner did not require separate authorisation by State Government or a
notification/authorization is evident from a plain construct of Section 10B
and once Section 2(b) mandates recognition and inclusion of Joint Commissioner
in expression “Commissioner”, there is, no requirement of separate
authorisation/notification of conferment of such authority; Remarks, “The
classification or the description of different categories in the Rules framed
under the 1948 Act clearly can neither control nor be determinative of the
authority which may exercise powers under Section 10B”, accordingly, dismisses
assessee’s revision petitions : Allahabad HC
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
India-Mauritius DTAA Protocol Notified: Key Tax Implications
The Government of India has notified the amendment to the Protocol of the India-Mauritius Double Tax Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) on 13 Oct...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
In a recent informal guidance letter, SEBI clarified whether a cousin of a Promoter Group member qualifies as a person ‘related to promote...
-
Slump sale is transfer of one or more business undertakings for a lump sum consideration, without assigning individual values to the each...
-
Key features of File Validation Utility (FVU) version 3.3 FVU 3.3 will be applicable for quarterly TDS/ TCS statements pertaining to...
-
CIT vs. The Instalment Supply Ltd (Delhi High Court) The assessee bought 1614 items of computer systems for Rs.40 lacs from HCL Hewlett ...
-
Facts The applicant („A‟) is a closely held Public Limited company incorporated in India in the year 1953. A‟s shareholder included A (...
-
01. TDS u/s 194J is required to be done for Royalty also w.e.f 13-7-2006. 02. Royalty had been defined under explanation 2 of se...
-
Until now, 'Samaritans' is not how the Independent Directors are purported by Clause 49 in the Listing agreement. An Independ...
-
1. Concept of “limited liability partnership” LLP is an alternative corporate business form that gives the benefits of limited liability ...
-
SREI Infrastructure Finance Ltd vs. ITSC (Delhi High Court) The assessee entered into a scheme of arrangement u/s 391-394 of the Compani...
No comments:
Post a Comment