Bengaluru ITAT directs
Vodafone Mobile Services Ltd. (‘assessee’) to pay Rs. 5 Cr on or before January
31, 2018 and retain balance of another 20% (rounded off to Rs. 10 cr.) as
balance in its bank account while granting stay for 3 months for balance amount;
Firstly, ITAT holds that there is no ‘prima facie’ case in favour of the
assessee as the issue involved in appeal (i.e. TDS applicability on
interconnect charges payment to foreign carriers) is covered against the
assessee by earlier year order in assessee’s own case; Next, ITAT relies on
jurisdictional HC ruling in Google India Private Ltd. wherein it was held that
for granting stay, payment of 55% of disputed demand and retaining balance of
another 20% of disputed demand in assessee’s bank account is just & proper
condition; Further, ITAT rejects giving much importance to the rectification
application filed by assessee (which according to assessee would reduce the
total demand for subject AY to Rs.34.66 cr.) as such application was
filed by assessee just a day prior to filing stay application and therefore,
could not be considered by AO, moreover, ITAT observes that assessee did not
demonstrate any ‘financial hardship’, cites SC ruling in Dunlop India
Ltd.; Noting that on payment of Rs.5 cr., the total payment against the
outstanding demand comes to 42.5% of the total disputed demand of Rs.47.05 Cr
(and about 57.7% if rectification application is allowed), ITAT directs Revenue
not to enforce recovery of the demand subject to assessee meeting the aforesaid
twin conditions:ITAT
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
GAAR Not Applicable to Genuine Capital Market Transactions: Telangana High Court
In a significant ruling, the Telangana High Court held that General Anti-Avoidance Rules (GAAR) cannot be invoked merely because a transacti...
-
Slump sale is transfer of one or more business undertakings for a lump sum consideration, without assigning individual values to the each...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
Facts Centrica India Offshore Private Limited (CIO), an Indian Company, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Centrica Plc, UK Centrica Plc a...
-
SREI Infrastructure Finance Ltd vs. ITSC (Delhi High Court) The assessee entered into a scheme of arrangement u/s 391-394 of the Compani...
-
The Tax Audit season has started and it’s the time when the Assessees rush to their Chartered Accountants (CA) to get their Tax Audit d...
-
Facts The taxpayer, a partnership firm, derived income from the business of handling and transport of ship containers, customs clearing a...
-
M/s. Alpha Projects Society P. Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) In AY 2005-06, the assessee made payments to contractors & for professi...
-
01. TDS u/s 194J is required to be done for Royalty also w.e.f 13-7-2006. 02. Royalty had been defined under explanation 2 of se...
-
F.No.354/66/2011-TRU Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Central Board of Excise & Customs...
-
M/s. Merilyn Shipping & Transports vs. ACIT (ITAT Visakhapatnam Special Bench) The assessee incurred brokerage expenses of Rs.38....
No comments:
Post a Comment