Bengaluru ITAT directs
Vodafone Mobile Services Ltd. (‘assessee’) to pay Rs. 5 Cr on or before January
31, 2018 and retain balance of another 20% (rounded off to Rs. 10 cr.) as
balance in its bank account while granting stay for 3 months for balance amount;
Firstly, ITAT holds that there is no ‘prima facie’ case in favour of the
assessee as the issue involved in appeal (i.e. TDS applicability on
interconnect charges payment to foreign carriers) is covered against the
assessee by earlier year order in assessee’s own case; Next, ITAT relies on
jurisdictional HC ruling in Google India Private Ltd. wherein it was held that
for granting stay, payment of 55% of disputed demand and retaining balance of
another 20% of disputed demand in assessee’s bank account is just & proper
condition; Further, ITAT rejects giving much importance to the rectification
application filed by assessee (which according to assessee would reduce the
total demand for subject AY to Rs.34.66 cr.) as such application was
filed by assessee just a day prior to filing stay application and therefore,
could not be considered by AO, moreover, ITAT observes that assessee did not
demonstrate any ‘financial hardship’, cites SC ruling in Dunlop India
Ltd.; Noting that on payment of Rs.5 cr., the total payment against the
outstanding demand comes to 42.5% of the total disputed demand of Rs.47.05 Cr
(and about 57.7% if rectification application is allowed), ITAT directs Revenue
not to enforce recovery of the demand subject to assessee meeting the aforesaid
twin conditions:ITAT
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
The Arbitrator’s Ledger: Financial Forensics in ODR
Let’s start with a small story in this regard. Client B, a mid-sized electrical components manufacturer registered as an MSME, supplied ma...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
THE issues before the Bench are - Whether when an expenditure is claimed to have been incurred by an assessee for promotion of his busine...
-
The posting had been move to another website. Please click the link below to get the access of the same. https://taxofindia.wordpress....
-
"whether tds should be deducted u/s 194C for payment made to travel agent for booking of airline tickets by a company for its employee...
-
Any tax, interest, penalty, fine or any other sum payable by virtue of an order passed under the Income Tax Act as specified in the ...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Karnataka High Court (HC) [1] on the constitutional validity of Health Security se Natio...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Delhi High Court (HC) [1] on whether the newly introduced pre-deposit requirement for fi...
-
The India-Mauritius DTAA, which entered into force on 1 April 1983, was amended by way of Protocol signed on 10 May 2016 [1] (2016 Protoc...
-
The overall effective tax rate of a U.S. multinational corporation may have significant impact on the value of its stock. Therefore, it ...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Gujarat High Court (HC)1 on the taxability of corporate guarantee provided by the Petitio...
No comments:
Post a Comment