Bengaluru ITAT directs
Vodafone Mobile Services Ltd. (‘assessee’) to pay Rs. 5 Cr on or before January
31, 2018 and retain balance of another 20% (rounded off to Rs. 10 cr.) as
balance in its bank account while granting stay for 3 months for balance amount;
Firstly, ITAT holds that there is no ‘prima facie’ case in favour of the
assessee as the issue involved in appeal (i.e. TDS applicability on
interconnect charges payment to foreign carriers) is covered against the
assessee by earlier year order in assessee’s own case; Next, ITAT relies on
jurisdictional HC ruling in Google India Private Ltd. wherein it was held that
for granting stay, payment of 55% of disputed demand and retaining balance of
another 20% of disputed demand in assessee’s bank account is just & proper
condition; Further, ITAT rejects giving much importance to the rectification
application filed by assessee (which according to assessee would reduce the
total demand for subject AY to Rs.34.66 cr.) as such application was
filed by assessee just a day prior to filing stay application and therefore,
could not be considered by AO, moreover, ITAT observes that assessee did not
demonstrate any ‘financial hardship’, cites SC ruling in Dunlop India
Ltd.; Noting that on payment of Rs.5 cr., the total payment against the
outstanding demand comes to 42.5% of the total disputed demand of Rs.47.05 Cr
(and about 57.7% if rectification application is allowed), ITAT directs Revenue
not to enforce recovery of the demand subject to assessee meeting the aforesaid
twin conditions:ITAT
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Section 56(2)(ix): Forfeiture of Advance Money Received – A Critical Analysis
The Dual Conditions for Taxability Section 56(2)(ix) of the Income Tax Act imposes tax liability on sums received as advance or otherwise du...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
Selling a property can trigger a significant tax liability in the form of capital gains tax. However, the Income-tax Act, 1961, allows you...
-
Clarifications from the GST Council The GST Council has recommended the following clarifications on ISD and cross charge:
-
The Indian tax landscape has witnessed several significant judicial pronouncements in recent months. From the Supreme Court to various Hig...
-
The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal has recently notified the Income-tax (Appellate Tribunal) Amendment Rules, 2025, introducing important p...
-
The Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime continues to evolve through judicial interpretations. From the Supreme Court to various High Court...
-
Sr No Due Date Related to Compliance to be made 1 11.07.2026 GST ...
-
In the case of "Maya Gopinathan vs Anoop SB 2024 INSC 334," the Hon'ble Supreme Court provided insightful guidance on the de...
-
For Non-Resident Indians (NRIs) planning to move back home, the relocation is only half the journey. The other half is understanding how t...
-
In a significant development, the Supreme Court has dismissed the Revenue’s Special Leave Petition (SLP) challenging a Bombay High Court (...
No comments:
Post a Comment