Mumbai ITAT holds that
consideration of Rs.112.83 lakhs received by assessee (a UAE
based Booz group company) for providing technical/professional
personnel to its Indian associated enterprise (i.e. Booz India)
during AY 2011-12, not taxable as business income under Article 7 of India-UAE
DTAA absent assessee’s PE in India; Rejects Revenue’s reliance on AAR
ruling which had held in case of other Booz group companies that they had PE in
India & income received by them from Indian companies was taxable as
business profit under Article 7; ITAT accepts assessee’s stand that without
examining the facts available in the present case, “the ruling given by
AAR in the group concern’s case should not have been taken by the tax
authorities as the basis for determining the existence or otherwise of PE of the
assessee herein”; Notes that the fees received by assessee for
provision of technical/professional personnel were in the nature of business
receipts; However, observes that there was no service PE constituted
since assessee’s employees worked for 156 solar days (i.e. lesser than 9 months
threshold), also notes that there was no fixed place PE as Booz India did
not earmark any specific place under the control or disposal of the assessee,
further rejects constitution of dependent agency PE :ITAT
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
India-Mauritius DTAA Protocol Notified: Key Tax Implications
The Government of India has notified the amendment to the Protocol of the India-Mauritius Double Tax Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) on 13 Oct...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
In a recent informal guidance letter, SEBI clarified whether a cousin of a Promoter Group member qualifies as a person ‘related to promote...
-
Slump sale is transfer of one or more business undertakings for a lump sum consideration, without assigning individual values to the each...
-
Key features of File Validation Utility (FVU) version 3.3 FVU 3.3 will be applicable for quarterly TDS/ TCS statements pertaining to...
-
CIT vs. The Instalment Supply Ltd (Delhi High Court) The assessee bought 1614 items of computer systems for Rs.40 lacs from HCL Hewlett ...
-
Facts The applicant („A‟) is a closely held Public Limited company incorporated in India in the year 1953. A‟s shareholder included A (...
-
01. TDS u/s 194J is required to be done for Royalty also w.e.f 13-7-2006. 02. Royalty had been defined under explanation 2 of se...
-
Until now, 'Samaritans' is not how the Independent Directors are purported by Clause 49 in the Listing agreement. An Independ...
-
1. Concept of “limited liability partnership” LLP is an alternative corporate business form that gives the benefits of limited liability ...
-
SREI Infrastructure Finance Ltd vs. ITSC (Delhi High Court) The assessee entered into a scheme of arrangement u/s 391-394 of the Compani...
No comments:
Post a Comment