Mumbai ITAT deletes
addition u/s. 41(1) [on account of cessation of trading liability] in case
assessee-company (engaged in engineering, designing services for oil & gas
industry) with respect to outstanding commission payable to its agent in Kuwait
(‘creditor’) for AY 2011-12; ITAT notes that assessee had entered into
MoU with the creditor for procuring business for assessee in Kuwait, noting
that the creditor did not make any request for clearance of commission of
Rs. 34.90 lakhs outstanding for more than 1460 days, AO made addition u/s.
41(1) treating it as liability ceased; Rejecting Revenue’s action, ITAT notes
that under the MoU, commission was payable only on realization of proceeds from
customers procured by agent, thus observes that the commission payable was
outstanding as the agent could not recover sales proceeds from customer;
Holds that by withholding commission payments of agent with respect to overdue
payment from its debtors, assessee has acted in a manner consistent with
principles of commercial expediency and in accordance with the terms of MOU,
thus remarks that “ … Revenue cannot direct assessee to act in a manner in
defiance to the principles of commercial expediency and in turn to damage its
own business interest.”; Observes that assessee had also produced details
of court cases at Kuwait and correspondences with its overseas buyers/agents
with respect to its efforts for making recovery etc. to justify that the
payments were still due from the customers:ITAT
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
India-Mauritius DTAA Protocol Notified: Key Tax Implications
The Government of India has notified the amendment to the Protocol of the India-Mauritius Double Tax Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) on 13 Oct...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
In a recent informal guidance letter, SEBI clarified whether a cousin of a Promoter Group member qualifies as a person ‘related to promote...
-
Slump sale is transfer of one or more business undertakings for a lump sum consideration, without assigning individual values to the each...
-
Key features of File Validation Utility (FVU) version 3.3 FVU 3.3 will be applicable for quarterly TDS/ TCS statements pertaining to...
-
CIT vs. The Instalment Supply Ltd (Delhi High Court) The assessee bought 1614 items of computer systems for Rs.40 lacs from HCL Hewlett ...
-
Facts The applicant („A‟) is a closely held Public Limited company incorporated in India in the year 1953. A‟s shareholder included A (...
-
01. TDS u/s 194J is required to be done for Royalty also w.e.f 13-7-2006. 02. Royalty had been defined under explanation 2 of se...
-
Until now, 'Samaritans' is not how the Independent Directors are purported by Clause 49 in the Listing agreement. An Independ...
-
1. Concept of “limited liability partnership” LLP is an alternative corporate business form that gives the benefits of limited liability ...
-
SREI Infrastructure Finance Ltd vs. ITSC (Delhi High Court) The assessee entered into a scheme of arrangement u/s 391-394 of the Compani...
No comments:
Post a Comment