HC
holds that Joint Commissioner (Executive) (JC) is empowered to exercise
revisional powers comprised under Section 10B of U.P. Trade Tax Act 1948;
Rejects assessee’s plea that no notification has been issued by State
Government conferring such authority, acts and decisions of JC cannot be
validated or saved by application of “de facto” doctrine, hence exercise of
power by JC was invalid, liable to be viewed as a mere usurper of office;
Observes, a careful reading of Section 10B clearly establish that initially the
provision empowered the Commissioner or such other officer not below the rank
of Deputy Commissioner to exercise powers of revision and later words “Deputy
Commissioner” was substituted by words “Joint Commissioner”; States, fact that
Commissioner did not require separate authorisation by State Government or a
notification/authorization is evident from a plain construct of Section 10B
and once Section 2(b) mandates recognition and inclusion of Joint Commissioner
in expression “Commissioner”, there is, no requirement of separate
authorisation/notification of conferment of such authority; Remarks, “The
classification or the description of different categories in the Rules framed
under the 1948 Act clearly can neither control nor be determinative of the
authority which may exercise powers under Section 10B”, accordingly, dismisses
assessee’s revision petitions : Allahabad HC
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Bombay High Court Clarifies Tax Exemption Eligibility for Venture Capital Funds
In a significant ruling, the Bombay High Court has reaffirmed that a Venture Capital Fund (VCF) registered with SEBI is entitled to claim ...
-
Slump sale is transfer of one or more business undertakings for a lump sum consideration, without assigning individual values to the each...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
Facts Centrica India Offshore Private Limited (CIO), an Indian Company, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Centrica Plc, UK Centrica Plc a...
-
The Tax Audit season has started and it’s the time when the Assessees rush to their Chartered Accountants (CA) to get their Tax Audit d...
-
SREI Infrastructure Finance Ltd vs. ITSC (Delhi High Court) The assessee entered into a scheme of arrangement u/s 391-394 of the Compani...
-
Facts The taxpayer, a partnership firm, derived income from the business of handling and transport of ship containers, customs clearing a...
-
M/s. Alpha Projects Society P. Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) In AY 2005-06, the assessee made payments to contractors & for professi...
-
01. TDS u/s 194J is required to be done for Royalty also w.e.f 13-7-2006. 02. Royalty had been defined under explanation 2 of se...
-
F.No.354/66/2011-TRU Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Central Board of Excise & Customs...
-
M/s. Merilyn Shipping & Transports vs. ACIT (ITAT Visakhapatnam Special Bench) The assessee incurred brokerage expenses of Rs.38....
No comments:
Post a Comment