Mumbai ITAT holds that
consideration of Rs.112.83 lakhs received by assessee (a UAE
based Booz group company) for providing technical/professional
personnel to its Indian associated enterprise (i.e. Booz India)
during AY 2011-12, not taxable as business income under Article 7 of India-UAE
DTAA absent assessee’s PE in India; Rejects Revenue’s reliance on AAR
ruling which had held in case of other Booz group companies that they had PE in
India & income received by them from Indian companies was taxable as
business profit under Article 7; ITAT accepts assessee’s stand that without
examining the facts available in the present case, “the ruling given by
AAR in the group concern’s case should not have been taken by the tax
authorities as the basis for determining the existence or otherwise of PE of the
assessee herein”; Notes that the fees received by assessee for
provision of technical/professional personnel were in the nature of business
receipts; However, observes that there was no service PE constituted
since assessee’s employees worked for 156 solar days (i.e. lesser than 9 months
threshold), also notes that there was no fixed place PE as Booz India did
not earmark any specific place under the control or disposal of the assessee,
further rejects constitution of dependent agency PE :ITAT
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Bombay High Court Clarifies Tax Exemption Eligibility for Venture Capital Funds
In a significant ruling, the Bombay High Court has reaffirmed that a Venture Capital Fund (VCF) registered with SEBI is entitled to claim ...
-
Slump sale is transfer of one or more business undertakings for a lump sum consideration, without assigning individual values to the each...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
Facts Centrica India Offshore Private Limited (CIO), an Indian Company, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Centrica Plc, UK Centrica Plc a...
-
The Tax Audit season has started and it’s the time when the Assessees rush to their Chartered Accountants (CA) to get their Tax Audit d...
-
SREI Infrastructure Finance Ltd vs. ITSC (Delhi High Court) The assessee entered into a scheme of arrangement u/s 391-394 of the Compani...
-
Facts The taxpayer, a partnership firm, derived income from the business of handling and transport of ship containers, customs clearing a...
-
M/s. Alpha Projects Society P. Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) In AY 2005-06, the assessee made payments to contractors & for professi...
-
01. TDS u/s 194J is required to be done for Royalty also w.e.f 13-7-2006. 02. Royalty had been defined under explanation 2 of se...
-
F.No.354/66/2011-TRU Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Central Board of Excise & Customs...
-
M/s. Merilyn Shipping & Transports vs. ACIT (ITAT Visakhapatnam Special Bench) The assessee incurred brokerage expenses of Rs.38....
No comments:
Post a Comment