Madras
HC directs continuance of status quo and bars precipitative
action by Central Govt. pursuant to preliminary findings by Director
General (DG) Safeguards recommending a provisional safeguard duty at 70% ad
valorem on import of “Solar Cells"; Notes assessee’s challenge to the
preliminary findings on premise that they are in violation of principles of
natural justice, being made before expiry of 30 days as provided in initiation
notification; As per assessee, it is entitled to be heard in the matter and
therefore, notification issued without doing is illegal, arbitrary, without
authority of law and in contravention of Customs Tariff Act, 1975 r/w Rule 6 of
Custom Tariff (Identification and Assessment of Safeguard duty) Rules, 1997;
Further notes assessee’s challenge to recommendation of DG Safeguard for
exemption of safeguard duty on clearance made from SEZ to DTA, contending that
DG Safeguards does not have the power to recommend exemption in terms of 8B(2)
of Customs Tariff Act: HC issues notice to Revenue while posting the matter for
hearing on February 2, 2018 : Madras HC
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Bombay High Court Clarifies Tax Exemption Eligibility for Venture Capital Funds
In a significant ruling, the Bombay High Court has reaffirmed that a Venture Capital Fund (VCF) registered with SEBI is entitled to claim ...
-
Slump sale is transfer of one or more business undertakings for a lump sum consideration, without assigning individual values to the each...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
Facts Centrica India Offshore Private Limited (CIO), an Indian Company, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Centrica Plc, UK Centrica Plc a...
-
The Tax Audit season has started and it’s the time when the Assessees rush to their Chartered Accountants (CA) to get their Tax Audit d...
-
SREI Infrastructure Finance Ltd vs. ITSC (Delhi High Court) The assessee entered into a scheme of arrangement u/s 391-394 of the Compani...
-
Facts The taxpayer, a partnership firm, derived income from the business of handling and transport of ship containers, customs clearing a...
-
M/s. Alpha Projects Society P. Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) In AY 2005-06, the assessee made payments to contractors & for professi...
-
01. TDS u/s 194J is required to be done for Royalty also w.e.f 13-7-2006. 02. Royalty had been defined under explanation 2 of se...
-
F.No.354/66/2011-TRU Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Central Board of Excise & Customs...
-
M/s. Merilyn Shipping & Transports vs. ACIT (ITAT Visakhapatnam Special Bench) The assessee incurred brokerage expenses of Rs.38....
No comments:
Post a Comment