Amortized
cost of modifying dies & tools supplied free by customer includible in
assessable value of manufactured motor vehicle parts; Noting that assessee
discharged service tax on modification charges collected from customer, CESTAT
observes that modification cost is nothing but an addition to the value of
overall dies & tools used in manufacture; Referring to Rule 6 of Central
Excise Valuation Rules, CESTAT remarks that it doesn’t make any difference
whether assessee carried out any modification to dies, moulds & tools
supplied free of cost by customer; Upholds invocation of extended period of
limitation on ground of suppression of facts, noting that assessee had never
disclosed collection of charges either through any communication / in monthly
returns; Rejects assessee’s plea of revenue neutrality, thereby disallowing
CENVAT credit to customer and also imposes penalty u/s 11AC : Mumbai CESTAT
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Gujarat High Court reaffirms mandatory right to personal hearing in Faceless Assessments
Recently, the Hon’ble Gujarat High Court in B.M. Developers v. Assessment Unit of Income-tax Department ruled in favor of the taxpayer and...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
Selling a property can trigger a significant tax liability in the form of capital gains tax. However, the Income-tax Act, 1961, allows you...
-
Clarifications from the GST Council The GST Council has recommended the following clarifications on ISD and cross charge:
-
The Indian tax landscape has witnessed several significant judicial pronouncements in recent months. From the Supreme Court to various Hig...
-
The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal has recently notified the Income-tax (Appellate Tribunal) Amendment Rules, 2025, introducing important p...
-
The Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime continues to evolve through judicial interpretations. From the Supreme Court to various High Court...
-
Sr No Due Date Related to Compliance to be made 1 11.07.2026 GST ...
-
In the case of "Maya Gopinathan vs Anoop SB 2024 INSC 334," the Hon'ble Supreme Court provided insightful guidance on the de...
-
In a significant development, the Supreme Court has dismissed the Revenue’s Special Leave Petition (SLP) challenging a Bombay High Court (...
-
For Non-Resident Indians (NRIs) planning to move back home, the relocation is only half the journey. The other half is understanding how t...
No comments:
Post a Comment