Ahmedabad ITAT, in second
round of litigation, confirms unexplained cash credit addition u/s. 68 with
respect to share premium received by assessee (a private limited company
manufacturing PVC pipes) for AY 2002-03; ITAT observes that the taxpayer could not
produce even a single party out of the 13 share premium paying parties despite
they all being based locally, remarks that “the assessee has not made any
effort in discharging its initial onus so as to satisfy the basic factors of
identity, capacity, genuineness and creditworthiness of the 13 parties in
question who have paid it a very hefty share premium of Rs.90/- per share in
question.” ; Further, ITAT notes that assessee could not even submit any
original confirmation, holds that “its subsequent action in submitting all 4
photocopies of the same date indicates a very serious genuineness issue”;
Tribunal clarifies that mere filing of confirmation letter or by receiving
money through banking channel or by filing PAN particulars will not discharge
assessee’s onus; While acknowledging that there cannot be any 'straight jacket
formula' to determine share premium, Tribunal however puts onus squarely on the
assessee for its failure to even prima facie demonstrate the intrinsic value of
shares to be at par with the the exorbitant premium received; Applies Apex
Court ratios in Sumati Dayal and Durgaprasad More, wherein the Courts advocated
judging of evidence by applying the test of "human
probabilities".:ITAT
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
India-Mauritius DTAA Protocol Notified: Key Tax Implications
The Government of India has notified the amendment to the Protocol of the India-Mauritius Double Tax Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) on 13 Oct...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
Slump sale is transfer of one or more business undertakings for a lump sum consideration, without assigning individual values to the each...
-
In a recent informal guidance letter, SEBI clarified whether a cousin of a Promoter Group member qualifies as a person ‘related to promote...
-
Key features of File Validation Utility (FVU) version 3.3 FVU 3.3 will be applicable for quarterly TDS/ TCS statements pertaining to...
-
Facts The applicant („A‟) is a closely held Public Limited company incorporated in India in the year 1953. A‟s shareholder included A (...
-
CIT vs. The Instalment Supply Ltd (Delhi High Court) The assessee bought 1614 items of computer systems for Rs.40 lacs from HCL Hewlett ...
-
01. TDS u/s 194J is required to be done for Royalty also w.e.f 13-7-2006. 02. Royalty had been defined under explanation 2 of se...
-
Until now, 'Samaritans' is not how the Independent Directors are purported by Clause 49 in the Listing agreement. An Independ...
-
Facts Centrica India Offshore Private Limited (CIO), an Indian Company, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Centrica Plc, UK Centrica Plc a...
-
1. Concept of “limited liability partnership” LLP is an alternative corporate business form that gives the benefits of limited liability ...
No comments:
Post a Comment