Ahmedabad ITAT, in second
round of litigation, confirms unexplained cash credit addition u/s. 68 with
respect to share premium received by assessee (a private limited company
manufacturing PVC pipes) for AY 2002-03; ITAT observes that the taxpayer could not
produce even a single party out of the 13 share premium paying parties despite
they all being based locally, remarks that “the assessee has not made any
effort in discharging its initial onus so as to satisfy the basic factors of
identity, capacity, genuineness and creditworthiness of the 13 parties in
question who have paid it a very hefty share premium of Rs.90/- per share in
question.” ; Further, ITAT notes that assessee could not even submit any
original confirmation, holds that “its subsequent action in submitting all 4
photocopies of the same date indicates a very serious genuineness issue”;
Tribunal clarifies that mere filing of confirmation letter or by receiving
money through banking channel or by filing PAN particulars will not discharge
assessee’s onus; While acknowledging that there cannot be any 'straight jacket
formula' to determine share premium, Tribunal however puts onus squarely on the
assessee for its failure to even prima facie demonstrate the intrinsic value of
shares to be at par with the the exorbitant premium received; Applies Apex
Court ratios in Sumati Dayal and Durgaprasad More, wherein the Courts advocated
judging of evidence by applying the test of "human
probabilities".:ITAT
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
CBDT issues second round of frequently asked questions in relation to Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024
This Tax Alert summarizes Circular No. 19/2024 dated 16 December 2024 (VSV 2- December Circular) issued by the Central Board of Direct Tax...
-
PCIT vs. The Executor of Estate of Late Smt. Manjula A. Shah (Bombay High Court) S. 50C Capital Gains: The valuation of the stamp autho...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Supreme Court (SC) [1] on availability of CENVAT Credit on mobile towers and pre-fabrica...
-
IFRS and US GAAP - Similarities and Differences What is IFRS? And what is GAAP? The main difference between IFRS and US GAAP is that G...
-
Madras HC reverses ITAT's order, grants deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) to assessee (a society engaged in the business of banking and provi...
-
SC dismisses assessee-company’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order upholding re-assessment initiation (beyond 4 yrs period) based on a special...
-
SC dismisses Revenue’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order in case of assessee (belonging to Lodha group of companies engaged in real estate bu...
-
Claiming a foreign tax credit (FTC) in Australia allows companies to offset foreign taxes paid on income earned overseas against their Aust...
-
HC allows HDFC Bank’s writ petition, quashes AO’s order and subsequent reference to TPO alleging that certain related party transactions [p...
-
Delhi ITAT deletes Rs. 1558.57 cr. capital gains addition on Telenor India for AY 2014-15, holds that set off of non-refundable entry fee p...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Bombay High Court (HC)1 on admissibility of input tax credit (ITC) w.r.t GST on advance p...
No comments:
Post a Comment