Delhi HC quashes Sec. 148
proceedings (initiated beyond 4 years period) on assessee–company (engaged
in the real estate business) for AY 2008-09; AO had recorded reasons
that the five companies that subscribed to assessee’s share capital were ‘paper
companies’, however, HC notes that assessee had disclosed the names of all the
five companies along with the details of share premium amount received from
them during original assessment proceedings; Accordingly, HC holds there was
‘no new material’ for initiating re-assessment, remarks that “the reasons for
reopening do not mention as to what fact or information was not disclosed by
the Petitioner…. An allegation that the companies are `paper companies' without
further facts is by itself insufficient to reopen assessments”; However,
considering that a large number of writ petitions are filed on a routine basis
challenging reopening u/s. 147/148, HC lays down a four-point guideline
in matters of reopening of assessments, viz.: 1) while communicating reasons,
copy of the standard form used by AO for obtaining the approval of the Superior
Officer should itself be provided to assessee, 2) reasons ought to spell out
all the reasons and grounds available with the AO for re-opening including
reference to investigation report or enquiry, 3) where the reasons make a
reference to another document, such document and/ or relevant portions of such
report should be enclosed along with reasons and 4) the exercise of considering
assessee’s objections to reopening, not a mechanical ritual, hence AO
should give proper reasons for the conclusion.:HC
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
CBDT issues second round of frequently asked questions in relation to Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024
This Tax Alert summarizes Circular No. 19/2024 dated 16 December 2024 (VSV 2- December Circular) issued by the Central Board of Direct Tax...
-
PCIT vs. The Executor of Estate of Late Smt. Manjula A. Shah (Bombay High Court) S. 50C Capital Gains: The valuation of the stamp autho...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Supreme Court (SC) [1] on availability of CENVAT Credit on mobile towers and pre-fabrica...
-
IFRS and US GAAP - Similarities and Differences What is IFRS? And what is GAAP? The main difference between IFRS and US GAAP is that G...
-
Madras HC reverses ITAT's order, grants deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) to assessee (a society engaged in the business of banking and provi...
-
SC dismisses assessee-company’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order upholding re-assessment initiation (beyond 4 yrs period) based on a special...
-
SC dismisses Revenue’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order in case of assessee (belonging to Lodha group of companies engaged in real estate bu...
-
Claiming a foreign tax credit (FTC) in Australia allows companies to offset foreign taxes paid on income earned overseas against their Aust...
-
HC allows HDFC Bank’s writ petition, quashes AO’s order and subsequent reference to TPO alleging that certain related party transactions [p...
-
Delhi ITAT deletes Rs. 1558.57 cr. capital gains addition on Telenor India for AY 2014-15, holds that set off of non-refundable entry fee p...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Bombay High Court (HC)1 on admissibility of input tax credit (ITC) w.r.t GST on advance p...
No comments:
Post a Comment