Delhi HC quashes Sec. 148
proceedings (initiated beyond 4 years period) on assessee–company (engaged
in the real estate business) for AY 2008-09; AO had recorded reasons
that the five companies that subscribed to assessee’s share capital were ‘paper
companies’, however, HC notes that assessee had disclosed the names of all the
five companies along with the details of share premium amount received from
them during original assessment proceedings; Accordingly, HC holds there was
‘no new material’ for initiating re-assessment, remarks that “the reasons for
reopening do not mention as to what fact or information was not disclosed by
the Petitioner…. An allegation that the companies are `paper companies' without
further facts is by itself insufficient to reopen assessments”; However,
considering that a large number of writ petitions are filed on a routine basis
challenging reopening u/s. 147/148, HC lays down a four-point guideline
in matters of reopening of assessments, viz.: 1) while communicating reasons,
copy of the standard form used by AO for obtaining the approval of the Superior
Officer should itself be provided to assessee, 2) reasons ought to spell out
all the reasons and grounds available with the AO for re-opening including
reference to investigation report or enquiry, 3) where the reasons make a
reference to another document, such document and/ or relevant portions of such
report should be enclosed along with reasons and 4) the exercise of considering
assessee’s objections to reopening, not a mechanical ritual, hence AO
should give proper reasons for the conclusion.:HC
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Gujarat High Court reaffirms mandatory right to personal hearing in Faceless Assessments
Recently, the Hon’ble Gujarat High Court in B.M. Developers v. Assessment Unit of Income-tax Department ruled in favor of the taxpayer and...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
Selling a property can trigger a significant tax liability in the form of capital gains tax. However, the Income-tax Act, 1961, allows you...
-
Clarifications from the GST Council The GST Council has recommended the following clarifications on ISD and cross charge:
-
The Indian tax landscape has witnessed several significant judicial pronouncements in recent months. From the Supreme Court to various Hig...
-
The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal has recently notified the Income-tax (Appellate Tribunal) Amendment Rules, 2025, introducing important p...
-
The Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime continues to evolve through judicial interpretations. From the Supreme Court to various High Court...
-
Sr No Due Date Related to Compliance to be made 1 11.07.2026 GST ...
-
In the case of "Maya Gopinathan vs Anoop SB 2024 INSC 334," the Hon'ble Supreme Court provided insightful guidance on the de...
-
In a significant development, the Supreme Court has dismissed the Revenue’s Special Leave Petition (SLP) challenging a Bombay High Court (...
-
For Non-Resident Indians (NRIs) planning to move back home, the relocation is only half the journey. The other half is understanding how t...
No comments:
Post a Comment