Delhi HC quashes Sec. 148
proceedings (initiated beyond 4 years period) on assessee–company (engaged
in the real estate business) for AY 2008-09; AO had recorded reasons
that the five companies that subscribed to assessee’s share capital were ‘paper
companies’, however, HC notes that assessee had disclosed the names of all the
five companies along with the details of share premium amount received from
them during original assessment proceedings; Accordingly, HC holds there was
‘no new material’ for initiating re-assessment, remarks that “the reasons for
reopening do not mention as to what fact or information was not disclosed by
the Petitioner…. An allegation that the companies are `paper companies' without
further facts is by itself insufficient to reopen assessments”; However,
considering that a large number of writ petitions are filed on a routine basis
challenging reopening u/s. 147/148, HC lays down a four-point guideline
in matters of reopening of assessments, viz.: 1) while communicating reasons,
copy of the standard form used by AO for obtaining the approval of the Superior
Officer should itself be provided to assessee, 2) reasons ought to spell out
all the reasons and grounds available with the AO for re-opening including
reference to investigation report or enquiry, 3) where the reasons make a
reference to another document, such document and/ or relevant portions of such
report should be enclosed along with reasons and 4) the exercise of considering
assessee’s objections to reopening, not a mechanical ritual, hence AO
should give proper reasons for the conclusion.:HC
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
GAAR Not Applicable to Genuine Capital Market Transactions: Telangana High Court
In a significant ruling, the Telangana High Court held that General Anti-Avoidance Rules (GAAR) cannot be invoked merely because a transacti...
-
Slump sale is transfer of one or more business undertakings for a lump sum consideration, without assigning individual values to the each...
-
Facts Centrica India Offshore Private Limited (CIO), an Indian Company, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Centrica Plc, UK Centrica Plc a...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
The Tax Audit season has started and it’s the time when the Assessees rush to their Chartered Accountants (CA) to get their Tax Audit d...
-
SREI Infrastructure Finance Ltd vs. ITSC (Delhi High Court) The assessee entered into a scheme of arrangement u/s 391-394 of the Compani...
-
Facts The taxpayer, a partnership firm, derived income from the business of handling and transport of ship containers, customs clearing a...
-
M/s. Alpha Projects Society P. Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) In AY 2005-06, the assessee made payments to contractors & for professi...
-
F.No.354/66/2011-TRU Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Central Board of Excise & Customs...
-
01. TDS u/s 194J is required to be done for Royalty also w.e.f 13-7-2006. 02. Royalty had been defined under explanation 2 of se...
-
M/s. Merilyn Shipping & Transports vs. ACIT (ITAT Visakhapatnam Special Bench) The assessee incurred brokerage expenses of Rs.38....
No comments:
Post a Comment