Delhi HC quashes Sec. 148
proceedings (initiated beyond 4 years period) on assessee–company (engaged
in the real estate business) for AY 2008-09; AO had recorded reasons
that the five companies that subscribed to assessee’s share capital were ‘paper
companies’, however, HC notes that assessee had disclosed the names of all the
five companies along with the details of share premium amount received from
them during original assessment proceedings; Accordingly, HC holds there was
‘no new material’ for initiating re-assessment, remarks that “the reasons for
reopening do not mention as to what fact or information was not disclosed by
the Petitioner…. An allegation that the companies are `paper companies' without
further facts is by itself insufficient to reopen assessments”; However,
considering that a large number of writ petitions are filed on a routine basis
challenging reopening u/s. 147/148, HC lays down a four-point guideline
in matters of reopening of assessments, viz.: 1) while communicating reasons,
copy of the standard form used by AO for obtaining the approval of the Superior
Officer should itself be provided to assessee, 2) reasons ought to spell out
all the reasons and grounds available with the AO for re-opening including
reference to investigation report or enquiry, 3) where the reasons make a
reference to another document, such document and/ or relevant portions of such
report should be enclosed along with reasons and 4) the exercise of considering
assessee’s objections to reopening, not a mechanical ritual, hence AO
should give proper reasons for the conclusion.:HC
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
India-Mauritius DTAA Protocol Notified: Key Tax Implications
The Government of India has notified the amendment to the Protocol of the India-Mauritius Double Tax Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) on 13 Oct...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
Slump sale is transfer of one or more business undertakings for a lump sum consideration, without assigning individual values to the each...
-
In a recent informal guidance letter, SEBI clarified whether a cousin of a Promoter Group member qualifies as a person ‘related to promote...
-
Key features of File Validation Utility (FVU) version 3.3 FVU 3.3 will be applicable for quarterly TDS/ TCS statements pertaining to...
-
Facts The applicant („A‟) is a closely held Public Limited company incorporated in India in the year 1953. A‟s shareholder included A (...
-
CIT vs. The Instalment Supply Ltd (Delhi High Court) The assessee bought 1614 items of computer systems for Rs.40 lacs from HCL Hewlett ...
-
01. TDS u/s 194J is required to be done for Royalty also w.e.f 13-7-2006. 02. Royalty had been defined under explanation 2 of se...
-
Until now, 'Samaritans' is not how the Independent Directors are purported by Clause 49 in the Listing agreement. An Independ...
-
Facts Centrica India Offshore Private Limited (CIO), an Indian Company, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Centrica Plc, UK Centrica Plc a...
-
1. Concept of “limited liability partnership” LLP is an alternative corporate business form that gives the benefits of limited liability ...
No comments:
Post a Comment