HC sets aside Single Judge
Bench order, finds direction to release detained goods on payment of 50% of
demand and execution of simple bond contrary to provisions of Section 129 of
Central GST Act / Kerala GST Ordinance r/w Rule 140 of CGST Rules; Notes that
goods were detained by Revenue on ground that documents accompanying them had
no nexus with actual goods under transport; Observes that Section 129 provides
for detention, seizure and release of goods and conveyances in transit, whereby
goods may be released provisionally upon execution of bond and furnishing of
security in prescribed manner or on payment of applicable tax, interest and
penalty in terms of Section 67(6); Hence, when statute itself provides a
mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods including provisional
release thereof, a deviation therefrom cannot be ordered, holds HC; However,
taking note of Rule 140 obliging dealer to produce goods upon demand, and
considering the inconvenience and prejudice likely to be caused on account of
delay, HC emphasizes the necessity of an expeditious adjudication even in cases
where goods are released provisionally : Kerala HC
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
India-Mauritius DTAA Protocol Notified: Key Tax Implications
The Government of India has notified the amendment to the Protocol of the India-Mauritius Double Tax Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) on 13 Oct...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
Slump sale is transfer of one or more business undertakings for a lump sum consideration, without assigning individual values to the each...
-
In a recent informal guidance letter, SEBI clarified whether a cousin of a Promoter Group member qualifies as a person ‘related to promote...
-
Key features of File Validation Utility (FVU) version 3.3 FVU 3.3 will be applicable for quarterly TDS/ TCS statements pertaining to...
-
Facts The applicant („A‟) is a closely held Public Limited company incorporated in India in the year 1953. A‟s shareholder included A (...
-
CIT vs. The Instalment Supply Ltd (Delhi High Court) The assessee bought 1614 items of computer systems for Rs.40 lacs from HCL Hewlett ...
-
01. TDS u/s 194J is required to be done for Royalty also w.e.f 13-7-2006. 02. Royalty had been defined under explanation 2 of se...
-
Until now, 'Samaritans' is not how the Independent Directors are purported by Clause 49 in the Listing agreement. An Independ...
-
Facts Centrica India Offshore Private Limited (CIO), an Indian Company, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Centrica Plc, UK Centrica Plc a...
-
1. Concept of “limited liability partnership” LLP is an alternative corporate business form that gives the benefits of limited liability ...
No comments:
Post a Comment