HC sets aside Single Judge
Bench order, finds direction to release detained goods on payment of 50% of
demand and execution of simple bond contrary to provisions of Section 129 of
Central GST Act / Kerala GST Ordinance r/w Rule 140 of CGST Rules; Notes that
goods were detained by Revenue on ground that documents accompanying them had
no nexus with actual goods under transport; Observes that Section 129 provides
for detention, seizure and release of goods and conveyances in transit, whereby
goods may be released provisionally upon execution of bond and furnishing of
security in prescribed manner or on payment of applicable tax, interest and
penalty in terms of Section 67(6); Hence, when statute itself provides a
mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods including provisional
release thereof, a deviation therefrom cannot be ordered, holds HC; However,
taking note of Rule 140 obliging dealer to produce goods upon demand, and
considering the inconvenience and prejudice likely to be caused on account of
delay, HC emphasizes the necessity of an expeditious adjudication even in cases
where goods are released provisionally : Kerala HC
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
CBDT issues second round of frequently asked questions in relation to Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024
This Tax Alert summarizes Circular No. 19/2024 dated 16 December 2024 (VSV 2- December Circular) issued by the Central Board of Direct Tax...
-
PCIT vs. The Executor of Estate of Late Smt. Manjula A. Shah (Bombay High Court) S. 50C Capital Gains: The valuation of the stamp autho...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Supreme Court (SC) [1] on availability of CENVAT Credit on mobile towers and pre-fabrica...
-
IFRS and US GAAP - Similarities and Differences What is IFRS? And what is GAAP? The main difference between IFRS and US GAAP is that G...
-
Madras HC reverses ITAT's order, grants deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) to assessee (a society engaged in the business of banking and provi...
-
SC dismisses assessee-company’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order upholding re-assessment initiation (beyond 4 yrs period) based on a special...
-
SC dismisses Revenue’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order in case of assessee (belonging to Lodha group of companies engaged in real estate bu...
-
Claiming a foreign tax credit (FTC) in Australia allows companies to offset foreign taxes paid on income earned overseas against their Aust...
-
HC allows HDFC Bank’s writ petition, quashes AO’s order and subsequent reference to TPO alleging that certain related party transactions [p...
-
Delhi ITAT deletes Rs. 1558.57 cr. capital gains addition on Telenor India for AY 2014-15, holds that set off of non-refundable entry fee p...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Bombay High Court (HC)1 on admissibility of input tax credit (ITC) w.r.t GST on advance p...
No comments:
Post a Comment