Allahabad HC sets-aside
ITAT order, grants registration u/s. 12AA to assessee-society with effect from
April, 2004 (date of filing fresh application) and not from the date of
original application u/s. 12AA in April, 2000; Assessee-society had
originally filed the application for registration u/s. 12AA in November, 2000,
which was rejected and upon filing of representation before CIT in September,
2004 against such rejection, assessee’s application was allowed, whereby
registration was granted w.e.f. April, 2004 and not from 2000; ITAT
however had allowed assessee's plea to grant the registration from the year
2000, which is rejected by the High Court; HC holds that the date of filing the
original application for registration has no relevance when the said
application was rejected, and the subsequent application/representation moved
in September, 2004 should be treated as a fresh application and accordingly the
registration of the society u/s. 12AA would be operative from April, 2004;
Further, HC notes that CIT, without recalling or setting aside its earlier
order, had unequivocally granted registration from 2004 onwards:HC
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
India-Mauritius DTAA Protocol Notified: Key Tax Implications
The Government of India has notified the amendment to the Protocol of the India-Mauritius Double Tax Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) on 13 Oct...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
Slump sale is transfer of one or more business undertakings for a lump sum consideration, without assigning individual values to the each...
-
In a recent informal guidance letter, SEBI clarified whether a cousin of a Promoter Group member qualifies as a person ‘related to promote...
-
Key features of File Validation Utility (FVU) version 3.3 FVU 3.3 will be applicable for quarterly TDS/ TCS statements pertaining to...
-
Facts The applicant („A‟) is a closely held Public Limited company incorporated in India in the year 1953. A‟s shareholder included A (...
-
CIT vs. The Instalment Supply Ltd (Delhi High Court) The assessee bought 1614 items of computer systems for Rs.40 lacs from HCL Hewlett ...
-
01. TDS u/s 194J is required to be done for Royalty also w.e.f 13-7-2006. 02. Royalty had been defined under explanation 2 of se...
-
Until now, 'Samaritans' is not how the Independent Directors are purported by Clause 49 in the Listing agreement. An Independ...
-
Facts Centrica India Offshore Private Limited (CIO), an Indian Company, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Centrica Plc, UK Centrica Plc a...
-
1. Concept of “limited liability partnership” LLP is an alternative corporate business form that gives the benefits of limited liability ...
No comments:
Post a Comment