Gujarat HC holds that mere
issuance of notice u/s. 143(2) & claiming extended period for processing of
refund u/s. 143(1) would not be sufficient to withhold tax refund for AYs
2015-16 and 2016-17; Assessee (a turnkey projects contractor) had filed tax
returns for both the years declaring high amount of tax losses and claimed tax
refunds arising on account of TDS and for one of years i.e. AY 2015-16, notice
u/s Sec 143(2) was issued but the assessment was not complete; Considering the
financial crunch and liquidity problems, the assessee followed up several times
with the IT Department for the release of the tax refunds, but did not receive
any response after which the assessee decided to approach HC; Noting the
amendments by Finance Act, 2017 and provisions as applicable to the assessee
i.e. post deletion of section 241 of the Act and prior to insertion of section
241A, HC observes that "the Revenue cannot contend that even though no
intimation under sub-section (1) of section 143 was issued within the time
envisaged and no notice under sub-section (2) of section 143 was issued, the
Assessing Officer can sit tight over the refund claimed by the assessee arising
out of the return filed"; HC further adds that "We simply
cannot accept the interpretation of the counsel
for the Revenue that once a notice under sub-section (2) of section 143 is
issued, the suspension of the refund arising out of the return filed by the
assessee would be automatic and till the passing of the order of assessment
under sub-section (3) of section 143"; HC states that it would be 'wholly
inequitable' for the AO to merely sit over the petitioner's request for refund
citing the availability of time upto the last date of framing the assessment
u/s 143(3); Applying the reasonable interpretation of the provisions, HC
observes that AO is expected to take up an expeditious disposal of the
processing of return u/s 143(1) once the assessee requests for release of the
refund and send as an intimation to the assessee if he wishes to withhold the
refund; For AY 2015-16, HC directs AO to complete the process of the assessee's
return u/s 143(1) latest by October 31, 2017 and notes that for AY 2016-17 the
time for processing the return under sub-section (1) of section 143 read with
proviso is not yet over:HC
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
CBDT issues second round of frequently asked questions in relation to Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024
This Tax Alert summarizes Circular No. 19/2024 dated 16 December 2024 (VSV 2- December Circular) issued by the Central Board of Direct Tax...
-
PCIT vs. The Executor of Estate of Late Smt. Manjula A. Shah (Bombay High Court) S. 50C Capital Gains: The valuation of the stamp autho...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Supreme Court (SC) [1] on availability of CENVAT Credit on mobile towers and pre-fabrica...
-
IFRS and US GAAP - Similarities and Differences What is IFRS? And what is GAAP? The main difference between IFRS and US GAAP is that G...
-
Madras HC reverses ITAT's order, grants deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) to assessee (a society engaged in the business of banking and provi...
-
SC dismisses assessee-company’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order upholding re-assessment initiation (beyond 4 yrs period) based on a special...
-
SC dismisses Revenue’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order in case of assessee (belonging to Lodha group of companies engaged in real estate bu...
-
Claiming a foreign tax credit (FTC) in Australia allows companies to offset foreign taxes paid on income earned overseas against their Aust...
-
HC allows HDFC Bank’s writ petition, quashes AO’s order and subsequent reference to TPO alleging that certain related party transactions [p...
-
Delhi ITAT deletes Rs. 1558.57 cr. capital gains addition on Telenor India for AY 2014-15, holds that set off of non-refundable entry fee p...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Bombay High Court (HC)1 on admissibility of input tax credit (ITC) w.r.t GST on advance p...
No comments:
Post a Comment