CBEC
decides to reassign cases pending as on June 30, 2017 at Commissioner (Appeals)
level, among all other jurisdictional officers of the rank of Commissioner
(including Principal Additional Director General / Additional Director
General), as a measure to reduce huge pendency of litigation; Accordingly,
vests such Central Excise Officers with power of passing order-in-appeal w.r.t.
appeals u/s 35 of Central Excise Act and Section 85 of Finance Act that were
filed on or before June 30; While laying down administrative guidelines for
Principal Chief Commissioners / Chief Commissioners to formulate proposals for
reallocation of pending appeals, CBEC states, “In no event should the assessees
be put to inconvenience by creating situations where they have to travel to
other towns and cities to attend hearings.”; Further states, “Proposals for
redistribution should be done in such a manner so that officers who are
relatively familiar with the relevant law are assigned cases. In particular
officers without a background knowledge of service tax law should not be
assigned service tax cases.”; Warns Commissioner (Appeals) of a serious view in
the event of mechanical remanding or hasty dismissal for nonappearance or ex
parte orders, or a mechanical upholding of order-in-original, merely in order
to achieve disposal : CBEC Notification & Circular
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
CBDT issues second round of frequently asked questions in relation to Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024
This Tax Alert summarizes Circular No. 19/2024 dated 16 December 2024 (VSV 2- December Circular) issued by the Central Board of Direct Tax...
-
PCIT vs. The Executor of Estate of Late Smt. Manjula A. Shah (Bombay High Court) S. 50C Capital Gains: The valuation of the stamp autho...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Supreme Court (SC) [1] on availability of CENVAT Credit on mobile towers and pre-fabrica...
-
IFRS and US GAAP - Similarities and Differences What is IFRS? And what is GAAP? The main difference between IFRS and US GAAP is that G...
-
Madras HC reverses ITAT's order, grants deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) to assessee (a society engaged in the business of banking and provi...
-
SC dismisses assessee-company’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order upholding re-assessment initiation (beyond 4 yrs period) based on a special...
-
SC dismisses Revenue’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order in case of assessee (belonging to Lodha group of companies engaged in real estate bu...
-
Claiming a foreign tax credit (FTC) in Australia allows companies to offset foreign taxes paid on income earned overseas against their Aust...
-
HC allows HDFC Bank’s writ petition, quashes AO’s order and subsequent reference to TPO alleging that certain related party transactions [p...
-
Delhi ITAT deletes Rs. 1558.57 cr. capital gains addition on Telenor India for AY 2014-15, holds that set off of non-refundable entry fee p...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Bombay High Court (HC)1 on admissibility of input tax credit (ITC) w.r.t GST on advance p...
No comments:
Post a Comment