HC
refuses to exercise extraordinary writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of
Constitution against its revision order passed u/s 11 of U.P. Sales Tax Act,
1948; Notes assessee’s grievance that demand for purchase tax was raised on
foodgrains procured for sale to Food Corporation of India after the HC had
finally decided its revision petition; Holds that order passed by the Court
cannot be annulled or reviewed by invoking Article 226 inasmuch as the issue in
question had been dealt, considered and decided against assessee; However,
referring to SC decisions in Major General Shri Kant Sharma & Anr. and
Mafatlal Industries Ltd. HC states that assessee can assail the revision order
before SC : Allahabad HC
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
In this article, for the benefit of our reader’s we have come up with detailed FAQ on procedures of issuance, requirement of Form 15CA an...
-
1. Situation I. Tax Department Summons An employee received a summons from the tax department demanding an explanation for failing to discl...
-
Particulars in Part 1 and Part 2 of Step-2 of registration form are required to be exactly the same as reported in the TDS statement. Plea...
-
In this post, I will discuss Secretarial Standards related to Proxies under SS – 2. Right to Appoint: A Member entitled to attend and ...
-
Many of us rely on home loans to purchase residential property, but are you fully aware of how tax laws impact your financial strategy? Unde...
-
Summary of the relevant updates is provided below for ease of your reference: A) Proposals relating to GST law, Compliances an...
-
Particulars Singapore Hong Kong Corporate Tax rate 17% 16.5%. Numb...
-
The circular of the Board dt. 28.06.1965 No. 17 (XL-36), provides for inspection fees and fees for certified copies of assessment and...
-
Recently, a few announcements made by our Finance Minister, Nirmala Sitharaman, sparked widespread discussions, particularly in the retail a...
No comments:
Post a Comment