Visakhapatnam ITAT upholds
levy of interest u/s 201(1A) for AY 2013-14 and 2014-15 in case of assessee
failing to deduct tax at source u/s 194J, rejects assessee’s contention that
since the deductee had filed nil return of income and had no tax liability,
even after taking into account receipts from assessee, interest u/s 201(1A) was
not leviable; Notes that proviso to Sec. 201(1A) inserted w.e.f July 1, 2012
makes it very clear that even though the assessee is not deemed to be 'assessee
in default' under the first proviso to Sec. 201(1), the interest u/s 201(1A) shall
be payable from the date on which such tax is deductible to the date of
furnishing of return of income by such deductee; Holds that the tax liability
in the hands of the deductee has no connection with charging of interest u/s
201(1A), distinguishes assessee's reliance on co-ordinate bench rulings as they
pertained to AY prior to amendment to Sec. 201(1A); Relies
on Calcutta HC judgment in Kanoi Properties Pvt. Ltd to hold
that charging of interest from the date on which the tax was required to be deducted
till the date of furnishing of return of income by the deductee is automatic
and mandatory; Rejects assessee’s contention that interest u/s 201(1A) was
compensatory in nature relying on Madras HC decision in Chennai Properties
& Investments Ltd.:ITAT
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
CBDT issues second round of frequently asked questions in relation to Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024
This Tax Alert summarizes Circular No. 19/2024 dated 16 December 2024 (VSV 2- December Circular) issued by the Central Board of Direct Tax...
-
PCIT vs. The Executor of Estate of Late Smt. Manjula A. Shah (Bombay High Court) S. 50C Capital Gains: The valuation of the stamp autho...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Supreme Court (SC) [1] on availability of CENVAT Credit on mobile towers and pre-fabrica...
-
IFRS and US GAAP - Similarities and Differences What is IFRS? And what is GAAP? The main difference between IFRS and US GAAP is that G...
-
Madras HC reverses ITAT's order, grants deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) to assessee (a society engaged in the business of banking and provi...
-
SC dismisses assessee-company’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order upholding re-assessment initiation (beyond 4 yrs period) based on a special...
-
SC dismisses Revenue’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order in case of assessee (belonging to Lodha group of companies engaged in real estate bu...
-
Claiming a foreign tax credit (FTC) in Australia allows companies to offset foreign taxes paid on income earned overseas against their Aust...
-
HC allows HDFC Bank’s writ petition, quashes AO’s order and subsequent reference to TPO alleging that certain related party transactions [p...
-
Delhi ITAT deletes Rs. 1558.57 cr. capital gains addition on Telenor India for AY 2014-15, holds that set off of non-refundable entry fee p...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Bombay High Court (HC)1 on admissibility of input tax credit (ITC) w.r.t GST on advance p...
No comments:
Post a Comment