Visakhapatnam ITAT upholds
levy of interest u/s 201(1A) for AY 2013-14 and 2014-15 in case of assessee
failing to deduct tax at source u/s 194J, rejects assessee’s contention that
since the deductee had filed nil return of income and had no tax liability,
even after taking into account receipts from assessee, interest u/s 201(1A) was
not leviable; Notes that proviso to Sec. 201(1A) inserted w.e.f July 1, 2012
makes it very clear that even though the assessee is not deemed to be 'assessee
in default' under the first proviso to Sec. 201(1), the interest u/s 201(1A) shall
be payable from the date on which such tax is deductible to the date of
furnishing of return of income by such deductee; Holds that the tax liability
in the hands of the deductee has no connection with charging of interest u/s
201(1A), distinguishes assessee's reliance on co-ordinate bench rulings as they
pertained to AY prior to amendment to Sec. 201(1A); Relies
on Calcutta HC judgment in Kanoi Properties Pvt. Ltd to hold
that charging of interest from the date on which the tax was required to be deducted
till the date of furnishing of return of income by the deductee is automatic
and mandatory; Rejects assessee’s contention that interest u/s 201(1A) was
compensatory in nature relying on Madras HC decision in Chennai Properties
& Investments Ltd.:ITAT
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
India-Mauritius DTAA Protocol Notified: Key Tax Implications
The Government of India has notified the amendment to the Protocol of the India-Mauritius Double Tax Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) on 13 Oct...
-
A new website launched for TDS related matters www.tdscpc.gov.in TRACES – T DS R econciliation A nalysis and C orrection E nabling S yste...
-
Slump sale is transfer of one or more business undertakings for a lump sum consideration, without assigning individual values to the each...
-
In a recent informal guidance letter, SEBI clarified whether a cousin of a Promoter Group member qualifies as a person ‘related to promote...
-
Key features of File Validation Utility (FVU) version 3.3 FVU 3.3 will be applicable for quarterly TDS/ TCS statements pertaining to...
-
Facts The applicant („A‟) is a closely held Public Limited company incorporated in India in the year 1953. A‟s shareholder included A (...
-
CIT vs. The Instalment Supply Ltd (Delhi High Court) The assessee bought 1614 items of computer systems for Rs.40 lacs from HCL Hewlett ...
-
01. TDS u/s 194J is required to be done for Royalty also w.e.f 13-7-2006. 02. Royalty had been defined under explanation 2 of se...
-
Until now, 'Samaritans' is not how the Independent Directors are purported by Clause 49 in the Listing agreement. An Independ...
-
Facts Centrica India Offshore Private Limited (CIO), an Indian Company, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Centrica Plc, UK Centrica Plc a...
-
1. Concept of “limited liability partnership” LLP is an alternative corporate business form that gives the benefits of limited liability ...
No comments:
Post a Comment