IT department issues order
covering various aspects of conducting scrutiny assessments electronically in
cases which are getting barred by limitation during the financial year
2017-2018; The e-assessments will be conducted using the Income-Tax Business
Application (ITBA) which is an integrated platform to conduct various tax-proceedings
electronically through the 'e-Proceeding' facility and is a part of Income-tax
Department’s digital transformation of its business processes; Assessment
proceedings in the two categories of time-barring scrutiny cases, pending as on
October 1, 2017, where hearings have not been completed, would be carried out
through the 'e-Proceeding' facility on the ITBA; The first category
covers time-barring scrutiny cases in seven metro cities namely
Ahmedabad, Bengaluru, Chennai, Kolkata, Hyderabad, Delhi and Mumbai where
assessment proceedings are already underway through the 'e-mail based
communication' and where assessee is having 'e-Filing' account; In time-barring
scrutiny assessments under 'e-Proceeding', the assessees can voluntarily opt
out from 'e-Proceeding' at a subsequent stage under intimation to the AO;
The CBDT order states that online submissions may be filed till the office
hours on the date stipulated for compliance; In e-assessment cases, manual
intervention is permissible in the specified situations viz., i) where manual
books of accounts or original documents have to be examined; ii) where AO
invokes provisions of Sec 131 of the Act or a notice is issued for carrying out
third party enquiries/investigations; iii) where examination of witness is
required to be made by the concerned assessee or the Department; iv) where a
show-cause notice contemplating any adverse view is issued by the Assessing
Officer and assessee requests for personal hearing to explain the matter
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
CBDT issues second round of frequently asked questions in relation to Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024
This Tax Alert summarizes Circular No. 19/2024 dated 16 December 2024 (VSV 2- December Circular) issued by the Central Board of Direct Tax...
-
PCIT vs. The Executor of Estate of Late Smt. Manjula A. Shah (Bombay High Court) S. 50C Capital Gains: The valuation of the stamp autho...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Supreme Court (SC) [1] on availability of CENVAT Credit on mobile towers and pre-fabrica...
-
IFRS and US GAAP - Similarities and Differences What is IFRS? And what is GAAP? The main difference between IFRS and US GAAP is that G...
-
Madras HC reverses ITAT's order, grants deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) to assessee (a society engaged in the business of banking and provi...
-
SC dismisses assessee-company’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order upholding re-assessment initiation (beyond 4 yrs period) based on a special...
-
SC dismisses Revenue’s SLP challenging Bombay HC order in case of assessee (belonging to Lodha group of companies engaged in real estate bu...
-
Claiming a foreign tax credit (FTC) in Australia allows companies to offset foreign taxes paid on income earned overseas against their Aust...
-
HC allows HDFC Bank’s writ petition, quashes AO’s order and subsequent reference to TPO alleging that certain related party transactions [p...
-
Delhi ITAT deletes Rs. 1558.57 cr. capital gains addition on Telenor India for AY 2014-15, holds that set off of non-refundable entry fee p...
-
This Tax Alert summarizes a recent ruling of the Bombay High Court (HC)1 on admissibility of input tax credit (ITC) w.r.t GST on advance p...
No comments:
Post a Comment