HC
quashes show cause notices issued by Deputy Commissioner (CT) in exercise of
special powers u/s 32 of Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act seeking to
re-determine total taxable turnover of assessees, being barred by limitation
u/s 16 (dealing with escaped assessment); Notes that Section 32 allowed Dy.
Commissioner to suo moto revise / modify assessment order / proceedings if upon
enquiry it was found that same were prejudicial to interests of the Revenue;
However, such power could not be exercised if – (i) time for appeal against the
order had not expired, (ii) order had been made the subject of appeal /
revision, and (iii) more than 5 years had expired after passing thereof; HC
finds that in present cases, Dy. Commissioner had no new material to come to a conclusion
which warranted reopening of assessments and the averments set out in the show
cause notices did not reveal any independent enquiry having been made before
issuing them; Referring inter alia to Division Bench decision in A. Velayutha
Raja, HC holds that impugned show cause notices were wholly without
jurisdiction : Madras HC
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Background The 57th GST Council Meeting was held on 8 October 2026 and focused mainly on process reforms relating to registration, assessmen...
-
Slump sale is transfer of one or more business undertakings for a lump sum consideration, without assigning individual values to the each...
-
Facts Centrica India Offshore Private Limited (CIO), an Indian Company, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Centrica Plc, UK Centrica Plc a...
-
SREI Infrastructure Finance Ltd vs. ITSC (Delhi High Court) The assessee entered into a scheme of arrangement u/s 391-394 of the Compani...
-
The Tax Audit season has started and it’s the time when the Assessees rush to their Chartered Accountants (CA) to get their Tax Audit d...
-
Facts The taxpayer, a partnership firm, derived income from the business of handling and transport of ship containers, customs clearing a...
-
M/s. Alpha Projects Society P. Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) In AY 2005-06, the assessee made payments to contractors & for professi...
-
01. TDS u/s 194J is required to be done for Royalty also w.e.f 13-7-2006. 02. Royalty had been defined under explanation 2 of se...
-
CIT vs. Kan Construction And Colonizers (P) Ltd (Allahabad High Court) The assessee sold a plot of land for Rs. 79 lakhs. The AO held th...
-
F.No.354/66/2011-TRU Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Central Board of Excise & Customs...
-
1. Concept of “limited liability partnership” LLP is an alternative corporate business form that gives the benefits of limited liability ...
No comments:
Post a Comment